*/
Not a golden oldie. David Langwallner continues his series with a rather controversial choice
Michael Gove has launched war on extremism and no doubt extremism is to be condemned. The question is, of course, what is an extremist? And, even more pertinent, how do we legislate to control the same from undermining democracy and the rule of law?
Not long ago I did a case in Huntingdon, the place of Oliver Cromwell’s birth. At one level the Glorious Revolution was an objection to extremism and a celebration of religious difference worth remembering in an age of extremes of witch hunts. Then as now.
Cromwell, noticeably, was not tolerant of witch hunts and in 1650 led an invasion force into Gove’s country of origin to stop the Kirk-led Scottish witch hunt. While in Huntingdon, I visited an exhibition marking the 375th anniversary of the visitation of one of the most sinister figures in 17th century history, the infamous and self-styled ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew Hopkins.
Now, Witchfinder General is a controversial choice for this series and most decidedly not a golden oldie (in fact, it is a late 60s exercise in Grand Guignol). It is not easy viewing. The violence – well, even Quentin Tarantino might wince.
Directed by Michael Reeve and starring Vincent Price, the film follows Matthew Hopkins (Price) as self-styled ‘Witchfinder General’ travelling around East Anglia during the English Civil War hunting for witches and coercing confessions. Judge, jury and executioner wrapped in one. Whipping up mass hysteria in every town and village he visits to justify the interrogation, torture and execution of innocent people.
Hopkins is pursued around Eastern England by Roundhead soldier Richard Marshall (Ian Ogilvy) after he sets his wicked sights on Marshall’s fiancée Sara (Hilary Dwyer) and executes her uncle John Lowes (Rupert Davies).
As an aside, Hopkins is thought to have had some training as a lawyer (we have no evidence for this) and falsely claimed to have been appointed Witchfinder General by Parliament. He was well paid for his work which is said to have motivated his actions (Russell, Jeffrey B (1981), A History of Witchcraft, Thames & Hudson).
The most famous play about witch hunts is not Witchfinder General but Arthur Miller’s political allegory The Crucible (1953 – made into a film in 1996 by director Nicholas Hytner). In a recent production at the Gielgud Theatre there was an introduction in the programme by Stanley Schiff whose book The Salem Witch Hunt (2015) notes how in Freudian terms it was a conversion disorder which caused the hysteria of persecution and prosecution. Miller, cogently like a lawyer, after checking the trial record in Salem found that what was needed to convict was not corroboration of an actual act but spectral evidence. Much of the play is in fact in a court room where the dangling carrot of non-execution if a confession was made is clear.
Of course, Miller himself was targeted in the political witch hunt of the McCarthy Era as were many communist sympathisers or indeed even those with a slight leftist tinge. Consider this by Miller: ‘We are what we always were in Salem, but now the little crazy children are jangling the keys of the kingdom, and common vengeance writes the law!’
Legislatively targeting organisations for extremism is desperation. ‘Reds in our midst.’ And it is the little people who suffer the most and have the least resources to fight back. Not unlike the prosecution of sub-postmasters on a false Fujitsu system. Only after lives are destroyed does the establishment apologise.
I am also reminded of another linked film, Ken Russell’s The Devils (1971) a horror story portraying a priest’s fall after being accused of witchcraft, fuelled by populist nonsense and vengeful prosecutorial overkill.
Witchfinder General became a cult classic, perhaps due to the director’s premature death just nine months after its release. It was a performance of transcendent madness by Price (he judged this his greatest performance) and was much-censored at the time. But worthy of inclusion in this series.
Michael Gove has launched war on extremism and no doubt extremism is to be condemned. The question is, of course, what is an extremist? And, even more pertinent, how do we legislate to control the same from undermining democracy and the rule of law?
Not long ago I did a case in Huntingdon, the place of Oliver Cromwell’s birth. At one level the Glorious Revolution was an objection to extremism and a celebration of religious difference worth remembering in an age of extremes of witch hunts. Then as now.
Cromwell, noticeably, was not tolerant of witch hunts and in 1650 led an invasion force into Gove’s country of origin to stop the Kirk-led Scottish witch hunt. While in Huntingdon, I visited an exhibition marking the 375th anniversary of the visitation of one of the most sinister figures in 17th century history, the infamous and self-styled ‘Witchfinder General’ Matthew Hopkins.
Now, Witchfinder General is a controversial choice for this series and most decidedly not a golden oldie (in fact, it is a late 60s exercise in Grand Guignol). It is not easy viewing. The violence – well, even Quentin Tarantino might wince.
Directed by Michael Reeve and starring Vincent Price, the film follows Matthew Hopkins (Price) as self-styled ‘Witchfinder General’ travelling around East Anglia during the English Civil War hunting for witches and coercing confessions. Judge, jury and executioner wrapped in one. Whipping up mass hysteria in every town and village he visits to justify the interrogation, torture and execution of innocent people.
Hopkins is pursued around Eastern England by Roundhead soldier Richard Marshall (Ian Ogilvy) after he sets his wicked sights on Marshall’s fiancée Sara (Hilary Dwyer) and executes her uncle John Lowes (Rupert Davies).
As an aside, Hopkins is thought to have had some training as a lawyer (we have no evidence for this) and falsely claimed to have been appointed Witchfinder General by Parliament. He was well paid for his work which is said to have motivated his actions (Russell, Jeffrey B (1981), A History of Witchcraft, Thames & Hudson).
The most famous play about witch hunts is not Witchfinder General but Arthur Miller’s political allegory The Crucible (1953 – made into a film in 1996 by director Nicholas Hytner). In a recent production at the Gielgud Theatre there was an introduction in the programme by Stanley Schiff whose book The Salem Witch Hunt (2015) notes how in Freudian terms it was a conversion disorder which caused the hysteria of persecution and prosecution. Miller, cogently like a lawyer, after checking the trial record in Salem found that what was needed to convict was not corroboration of an actual act but spectral evidence. Much of the play is in fact in a court room where the dangling carrot of non-execution if a confession was made is clear.
Of course, Miller himself was targeted in the political witch hunt of the McCarthy Era as were many communist sympathisers or indeed even those with a slight leftist tinge. Consider this by Miller: ‘We are what we always were in Salem, but now the little crazy children are jangling the keys of the kingdom, and common vengeance writes the law!’
Legislatively targeting organisations for extremism is desperation. ‘Reds in our midst.’ And it is the little people who suffer the most and have the least resources to fight back. Not unlike the prosecution of sub-postmasters on a false Fujitsu system. Only after lives are destroyed does the establishment apologise.
I am also reminded of another linked film, Ken Russell’s The Devils (1971) a horror story portraying a priest’s fall after being accused of witchcraft, fuelled by populist nonsense and vengeful prosecutorial overkill.
Witchfinder General became a cult classic, perhaps due to the director’s premature death just nine months after its release. It was a performance of transcendent madness by Price (he judged this his greatest performance) and was much-censored at the time. But worthy of inclusion in this series.
Not a golden oldie. David Langwallner continues his series with a rather controversial choice
Sam Townend KC explains the Bar Council’s efforts towards ensuring a bright future for the profession
Giovanni D’Avola explores the issue of over-citation of unreported cases and the ‘added value’ elements of a law report
Louise Crush explores the key points and opportunities for tax efficiency
Westgate Wealth Management Ltd is a Partner Practice of FTSE 100 company St. James’s Place – one of the top UK Wealth Management firms. We offer a holistic service of distinct quality, integrity, and excellence with the aim to build a professional and valuable relationship with our clients, helping to provide them with security now, prosperity in the future and the highest standard of service in all of our dealings.
Is now the time to review your financial position, having reached a career milestone? asks Louise Crush
If you were to host a dinner party with 10 guests, and you asked them to explain what financial planning is and how it differs to financial advice, you’d receive 10 different answers. The variety of answers highlights the ongoing need to clarify and promote the value of financial planning.
Most of us like to think we would risk our career in order to meet our ethical obligations, so why have so many lawyers failed to hold the line? asks Flora Page
If your current practice environment is bringing you down, seek a new one. However daunting the change, it will be worth it, says Anon Barrister
Creating advocacy opportunities for juniors is now the expectation but not always easy to put into effect. Tom Mitcheson KC distils developing best practice from the Patents Court initiative already bearing fruit
National courts are now running the bulk of the world’s war crimes cases and corporate prosecutions are part of this growing trend, reports Chris Stephen
Let’s hear it for the assessors, says Dame Anne Rafferty of the KC Selection Panel. And to make silk assessors’ lives a little easier when applicants come calling in May, Dame Anne fields some commonly asked questions