*/
THE third round of appointments as Queen’s Counsel has been announced.
These appointments are made by an independent Selection Panel, which recommends who should receive this highly sought-after award. All those appointed have demonstrated excellence in advocacy in the higher courts. Baroness Butler-Sloss, Interim Chairman of the QC Selection Panel, said:
“I have the pleasure of announcing these 104 names. All applicants are assessed against a common competency framework and the same standard of excellence and it is encouraging to see that a wide variety of advocates are among those whose appointment is announced today. There are no quotas, and we treat all applications in the same way, but the range of appointments reflects the openness and fairness of the selection process. On this occasion, the Selection Panel made two significant improvements to the scheme, firstly by inviting applicants to describe the nature of their particular practice in their self-assessment and secondly by looking specifically
at both preparation for, and resolution of, disputes in relation to written and oral advocacy.
Although I applaud the achievement of all those whose appointment was announced today there are four categories of applicant which I would like to single out for special mention:
Employed Barristers: I know there have been concerns at the employed bar that the current selection arrangements are not for them. Our process is for any advocate whatever their employment status who can demonstrate excellence in written or oral advocacy in the higher courts. This year only two employed barristers applied, but I am delighted to say that they have both been appointed. I hope that this will encourage other suitable employed advocates to apply in the future.
Solicitor Advocates: This year only 4 solicitor advocates applied, but of these 3 (75%) have been appointed. Again I hope this will encourage solicitor advocates with the appropriate experience to apply in the future
Women: For the third year running the success rate for women applicants is significantly better than for men: 55% for women compared 40% for men. It is particularly disappointing therefore that fewer women seem to be applying for Silk, resulting in fewer appointments.
Ethnic minorities: As last year there are four appointments of applicants declaring an ethnic origin other than white.
I would hope that potential applicants from these groups will be heartened by these successes. I would encourage suitably qualified applicants from under represented groups to apply, and I hope that those who work with well qualified practitioners, whatever their background, to apply for Silk when they judge the time is right.
All our decisions have been based solely on the evidence before the Selection Panel on this occasion. The list is composed as it is because that is where the evidence led us.
I should like to congratulate the new QCs. I also have an important message for those applicants who were not successful on this occasion. The standard for appointment is very high. If you have not been appointed that does not mean that you are not a valued and perfectly competent advocate.”
She added:
“We are publishing a short report giving further information about this year's competition, with statistical information relating to successful and unsuccessful applicants. It will be available on our website. The Selection Panel would also like to express its warm appreciation of the contribution of the 1800 people who provided an assessment on one or more applicants, and without whom the process could not have worked effectively.
On a personal basis I should also like to express my thanks and appreciation to the three Selection Panel members who are now standing down after three competitions and whose contribution to establishing a fair, open and transparent selection system for Queen’s Counsel has been outstanding: Roy Amlot QC, Ruth Evans and Christopher Woolley.”
The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Rt. Hon. Jack Straw MP, announced today (under embargo) the names of 104 Queen’s Counsel from 247 applicants. This compares with 175 appointments (40%) from 443 applications in 2006-07 and 98 appointments (29%) from 333 applications in 2007-08.
The 104 (42% of all applicants) appointed this year included:
Although I applaud the achievement of all those whose appointment was announced today there are four categories of applicant which I would like to single out for special mention:
Employed Barristers: I know there have been concerns at the employed bar that the current selection arrangements are not for them. Our process is for any advocate whatever their employment status who can demonstrate excellence in written or oral advocacy in the higher courts. This year only two employed barristers applied, but I am delighted to say that they have both been appointed. I hope that this will encourage other suitable employed advocates to apply in the future.
Solicitor Advocates: This year only 4 solicitor advocates applied, but of these 3 (75%) have been appointed. Again I hope this will encourage solicitor advocates with the appropriate experience to apply in the future
Women: For the third year running the success rate for women applicants is significantly better than for men: 55% for women compared 40% for men. It is particularly disappointing therefore that fewer women seem to be applying for Silk, resulting in fewer appointments.
Ethnic minorities: As last year there are four appointments of applicants declaring an ethnic origin other than white.
I would hope that potential applicants from these groups will be heartened by these successes. I would encourage suitably qualified applicants from under represented groups to apply, and I hope that those who work with well qualified practitioners, whatever their background, to apply for Silk when they judge the time is right.
All our decisions have been based solely on the evidence before the Selection Panel on this occasion. The list is composed as it is because that is where the evidence led us.
I should like to congratulate the new QCs. I also have an important message for those applicants who were not successful on this occasion. The standard for appointment is very high. If you have not been appointed that does not mean that you are not a valued and perfectly competent advocate.”
She added:
“We are publishing a short report giving further information about this year's competition, with statistical information relating to successful and unsuccessful applicants. It will be available on our website. The Selection Panel would also like to express its warm appreciation of the contribution of the 1800 people who provided an assessment on one or more applicants, and without whom the process could not have worked effectively.
On a personal basis I should also like to express my thanks and appreciation to the three Selection Panel members who are now standing down after three competitions and whose contribution to establishing a fair, open and transparent selection system for Queen’s Counsel has been outstanding: Roy Amlot QC, Ruth Evans and Christopher Woolley.”
The Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Rt. Hon. Jack Straw MP, announced today (under embargo) the names of 104 Queen’s Counsel from 247 applicants. This compares with 175 appointments (40%) from 443 applications in 2006-07 and 98 appointments (29%) from 333 applications in 2007-08.
The 104 (42% of all applicants) appointed this year included:
THE third round of appointments as Queen’s Counsel has been announced.
These appointments are made by an independent Selection Panel, which recommends who should receive this highly sought-after award. All those appointed have demonstrated excellence in advocacy in the higher courts. Baroness Butler-Sloss, Interim Chairman of the QC Selection Panel, said:
“I have the pleasure of announcing these 104 names. All applicants are assessed against a common competency framework and the same standard of excellence and it is encouraging to see that a wide variety of advocates are among those whose appointment is announced today. There are no quotas, and we treat all applications in the same way, but the range of appointments reflects the openness and fairness of the selection process. On this occasion, the Selection Panel made two significant improvements to the scheme, firstly by inviting applicants to describe the nature of their particular practice in their self-assessment and secondly by looking specifically
at both preparation for, and resolution of, disputes in relation to written and oral advocacy.
Barbara Mills KC, the new Chair of the Bar, outlines some key themes and priorities
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the role that drug, alcohol and DNA testing can play in non-court dispute resolution (NCDR)
Casey Randall explores what makes AlphaBiolabs the industry leader for court-admissible DNA testing
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
A family lawyer has won a £500 donation for her preferred charity, an education centre for women from disadvantaged backgrounds, thanks to drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs’ Giving Back campaign
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management highlights some of the ways you can cut your IHT bill
What's it like being a legal trainee at the Crown Prosecution Service? Amy describes what drew her to the role, the skills required and a typical day in the life
Barbara Mills KC wants to raise the profile of the family Bar. She also wants to improve wellbeing and enhance equality, diversity and inclusion in the profession. She talks to Joshua Rozenberg KC (hon) about her plans for the year ahead
Are Birmingham’s Intensive Supervision Courts successfully turning women offenders’ lives around? Chloe Ashley talks to District Judge Michelle Smith
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC identify good value bottles across the price spectrum – from festive fizz to reliable reds
Governments who play fast and loose with the law get into real trouble, says the new Attorney General. The Rt Hon Lord Hermer KC talks to Anthony Inglese CB about what drew this boy from Cardiff to the Bar, bringing the barrister ethos to the front bench, and how he will be measuring success
