*/
By adopting principles from elite athletes, barristers can elevate their courtroom performance through deeper case analysis and performance reviews, says Bibi Badejo
When we think of elite athletes like those who competed in the 2024 Paris Olympics, we often focus on their breathtaking performances – record-breaking sprints, gold-medal-winning dives, and awe-inspiring gymnastic routines. But their greatness is built on relentless preparation and analysis to understand their competition and optimise strategies.
Spending far more time training than competing, not only do elite athletes hone their skills through rigorous practice, but they also spend a significant amount of time analysing their competition and their performance.
Similarly, while we prepare our cases by reading papers, researching legal points, and drafting chronologies, the real value comes from case analysis. This means breaking down the structure, strengths and weaknesses of a case, asking critical questions, and crafting the strategies that will drive success.
Performance analysis is equally important, involving a review of your advocacy to identify areas for improvement. By adopting principles from elite athletes, barristers can elevate their courtroom performance through deeper case analysis and performance reviews.
A strategic mindset is crucial in advocacy, just as it is for elite athletes. Athletes don’t just focus on physical training; they approach competitions from multiple angles, preparing both physically and mentally. By adopting a similar multifaceted approach, barristers can better anticipate challenges and develop effective game plans. Considering different perspectives during our case analysis can lead to even more successful outcomes.
Consider how the judge may view the evidence and perceive witnesses. Your client’s opinion of them may not align with the judge’s, what is the most generous interpretation one could have of the opposing side’s witness? What is the most critical view one could have of your client or witness?
Approaching your case from multiple angles is a must; by considering various perspectives you can gain a deeper understanding of the case and its nuances. This allows you to identify opportunities, refine effective strategies, and adapt to changing circumstances. Like an elite athlete, success lies in thoughtful preparation and tactical foresight, ensuring you’re prepared.
Another valuable perspective to consider is that of your opponent. Just as elite athletes, like Serena Williams, study their competitors’ past performances and tactics to anticipate their next move, we can benefit from understanding our opponent’s case. Serena’s strength lies not just in her power but in her intelligence – she reads her opponents, adapts mid-match, and exploits weaknesses. This ability to adjust on the fly makes her a versatile and unpredictable competitor, giving her a mental advantage.
By undertaking a similar analysis, you give yourself the mental space to think clearly in court. Consider how you would run your case if you had been instructed on the other side. Anticipate their tactics by brainstorming potential arguments, evidence, and strategies they might use. Consider what steps might be taken to protect their client’s interests. This analysis can help you anticipate their defensive manoeuvres before they unfold. Then prepare your counter-strategy and plan your responses. Instead of scrambling to respond, your preparation will provide the clarity and flexibility needed to remain in control.
In anticipation of our opponent’s arguments, it is also crucial to address the weaknesses in our case. A critical question for every advocate is, ‘What concerns me about my case?’
These concerns often mirror the judge’s potential questions. Identifying weaknesses is only the first step; the true challenge for the advocate lies in strategically addressing them. Athletes confront their weaknesses head on. However, unlike an athlete who can eliminate a flaw through practice, that isn’t always the case for in court hearings, and you may have to concede a point.
The real power lies in how you manage these concessions. Will you concede upfront, or provide context that justifies certain decisions or behaviours? This might involve conceding certain points or crafting a narrative that reframes these weaknesses in a favourable light. Being proactive about these concerns allows you to store the narrative and present a credible, well-rounded argument.
Persuasion in the courtroom requires a balance between showing and telling. The skill lies in knowing when to show and when to tell. Showing engages the senses and allows your tribunal to experience the information, rather than simply describing it. This is particularly powerful when describing a key moment in your client’s story or when you want to evoke emotion. Telling, on the other hand, provides facts and information in a straightforward manner, which is useful when you need to communicate something quickly and efficiently. This might be when you are presenting background facts or summarising complex information. For instance, when outlining a timeline of events, you need to be clear and concise.
Just as elite athletes carefully choose between different techniques – deciding when to prioritise speed or endurance – barristers must skilfully balance showing and telling in their advocacy. For athletes, it’s about selecting the optimal move at the right moment to gain a competitive edge. In advocacy, it’s about understanding when to evoke vivid detail and when to provide a concise summary, each technique serving a specific purpose depending on the context of the case.
Kobe Bryant and Cristiano Ronaldo are renowned for their relentless practice, refining their skills through constant drills. Whether it was Bryant’s early-morning shooting sessions or Ronaldo’s focus on ball control and accuracy, both understood that mastery comes from repetition and precision. Their success was built on muscle memory, allowing them to perform instinctively under pressure.
Similarly, barristers can use drills to refine their advocacy techniques. Breaking down advocacy into manageable parts and practising them repeatedly builds confidence and precision and allows advocates to perform instinctively under pressure.
For instance, if you want to maintain control over a witness during cross-examination, but your questions lack precision, an ideal drill is to limit yourself to 10 words per question. 10 is not a magic number – it is arbitrary – but it forces you to be deliberate about every word you use. The shorter and more precise your questions the more efficient your cross-examination.
Both barristers and athletes gain valuable insights by reviewing their performances. Athletes study game footage to refine their techniques, and barristers should adopt a similar approach by reviewing transcripts, recordings, or notes from their advocacy. This practice allows you to become a student of the game, continually refining your skills and learning from both successes and missteps. Pay attention to the details and consider how you could have approached it differently. Explore what worked and what didn’t work. Note whether your submissions were received as intended. Were there points during witness handling where you felt control slipping? Reframing missed opportunities helps you prepare for better responses to similar situations in the future.
Seeking feedback is crucial for growth, and it should come from multiple sources. Peers can offer insight into your performance from someone who understands your challenges. Mentors provide the benefit of experience and can help guide you through difficult cases. Don’t overlook feedback from judges and opponents - their perspectives can reveal how your arguments were received and highlight areas for refinement.
In an early episode of The Advocacy Podcast, Ian Robertson SC (Senior Counsel, Australia) pointed out that even Roger Federer has a coach. A coach can help you refine your advocacy technique in the same way they do for elite athletes, breaking down complex skills and offering precise, actionable feedback. Coaches offer an objective perspective that you might miss on your own, helping you sharpen your cross-examinations, arguments, and witness handling.
Advocates are trained and not born. Everyone, from pupil barristers to silks, can become a more powerful advocate with the same relentless pursuit of mastery and stretching found in elite athletes. As barristers, our stakes are incredibly high; however, we can level the playing field by taking notes from our favourite sports stars.
Bibi Badejo, Founder and Host of the Advocacy Podcast, is a family law specialist at Four Brick Court Chambers, a Bencher and advocacy trainer at Inner Temple, and Founder of The Advocacy Coach.
When we think of elite athletes like those who competed in the 2024 Paris Olympics, we often focus on their breathtaking performances – record-breaking sprints, gold-medal-winning dives, and awe-inspiring gymnastic routines. But their greatness is built on relentless preparation and analysis to understand their competition and optimise strategies.
Spending far more time training than competing, not only do elite athletes hone their skills through rigorous practice, but they also spend a significant amount of time analysing their competition and their performance.
Similarly, while we prepare our cases by reading papers, researching legal points, and drafting chronologies, the real value comes from case analysis. This means breaking down the structure, strengths and weaknesses of a case, asking critical questions, and crafting the strategies that will drive success.
Performance analysis is equally important, involving a review of your advocacy to identify areas for improvement. By adopting principles from elite athletes, barristers can elevate their courtroom performance through deeper case analysis and performance reviews.
A strategic mindset is crucial in advocacy, just as it is for elite athletes. Athletes don’t just focus on physical training; they approach competitions from multiple angles, preparing both physically and mentally. By adopting a similar multifaceted approach, barristers can better anticipate challenges and develop effective game plans. Considering different perspectives during our case analysis can lead to even more successful outcomes.
Consider how the judge may view the evidence and perceive witnesses. Your client’s opinion of them may not align with the judge’s, what is the most generous interpretation one could have of the opposing side’s witness? What is the most critical view one could have of your client or witness?
Approaching your case from multiple angles is a must; by considering various perspectives you can gain a deeper understanding of the case and its nuances. This allows you to identify opportunities, refine effective strategies, and adapt to changing circumstances. Like an elite athlete, success lies in thoughtful preparation and tactical foresight, ensuring you’re prepared.
Another valuable perspective to consider is that of your opponent. Just as elite athletes, like Serena Williams, study their competitors’ past performances and tactics to anticipate their next move, we can benefit from understanding our opponent’s case. Serena’s strength lies not just in her power but in her intelligence – she reads her opponents, adapts mid-match, and exploits weaknesses. This ability to adjust on the fly makes her a versatile and unpredictable competitor, giving her a mental advantage.
By undertaking a similar analysis, you give yourself the mental space to think clearly in court. Consider how you would run your case if you had been instructed on the other side. Anticipate their tactics by brainstorming potential arguments, evidence, and strategies they might use. Consider what steps might be taken to protect their client’s interests. This analysis can help you anticipate their defensive manoeuvres before they unfold. Then prepare your counter-strategy and plan your responses. Instead of scrambling to respond, your preparation will provide the clarity and flexibility needed to remain in control.
In anticipation of our opponent’s arguments, it is also crucial to address the weaknesses in our case. A critical question for every advocate is, ‘What concerns me about my case?’
These concerns often mirror the judge’s potential questions. Identifying weaknesses is only the first step; the true challenge for the advocate lies in strategically addressing them. Athletes confront their weaknesses head on. However, unlike an athlete who can eliminate a flaw through practice, that isn’t always the case for in court hearings, and you may have to concede a point.
The real power lies in how you manage these concessions. Will you concede upfront, or provide context that justifies certain decisions or behaviours? This might involve conceding certain points or crafting a narrative that reframes these weaknesses in a favourable light. Being proactive about these concerns allows you to store the narrative and present a credible, well-rounded argument.
Persuasion in the courtroom requires a balance between showing and telling. The skill lies in knowing when to show and when to tell. Showing engages the senses and allows your tribunal to experience the information, rather than simply describing it. This is particularly powerful when describing a key moment in your client’s story or when you want to evoke emotion. Telling, on the other hand, provides facts and information in a straightforward manner, which is useful when you need to communicate something quickly and efficiently. This might be when you are presenting background facts or summarising complex information. For instance, when outlining a timeline of events, you need to be clear and concise.
Just as elite athletes carefully choose between different techniques – deciding when to prioritise speed or endurance – barristers must skilfully balance showing and telling in their advocacy. For athletes, it’s about selecting the optimal move at the right moment to gain a competitive edge. In advocacy, it’s about understanding when to evoke vivid detail and when to provide a concise summary, each technique serving a specific purpose depending on the context of the case.
Kobe Bryant and Cristiano Ronaldo are renowned for their relentless practice, refining their skills through constant drills. Whether it was Bryant’s early-morning shooting sessions or Ronaldo’s focus on ball control and accuracy, both understood that mastery comes from repetition and precision. Their success was built on muscle memory, allowing them to perform instinctively under pressure.
Similarly, barristers can use drills to refine their advocacy techniques. Breaking down advocacy into manageable parts and practising them repeatedly builds confidence and precision and allows advocates to perform instinctively under pressure.
For instance, if you want to maintain control over a witness during cross-examination, but your questions lack precision, an ideal drill is to limit yourself to 10 words per question. 10 is not a magic number – it is arbitrary – but it forces you to be deliberate about every word you use. The shorter and more precise your questions the more efficient your cross-examination.
Both barristers and athletes gain valuable insights by reviewing their performances. Athletes study game footage to refine their techniques, and barristers should adopt a similar approach by reviewing transcripts, recordings, or notes from their advocacy. This practice allows you to become a student of the game, continually refining your skills and learning from both successes and missteps. Pay attention to the details and consider how you could have approached it differently. Explore what worked and what didn’t work. Note whether your submissions were received as intended. Were there points during witness handling where you felt control slipping? Reframing missed opportunities helps you prepare for better responses to similar situations in the future.
Seeking feedback is crucial for growth, and it should come from multiple sources. Peers can offer insight into your performance from someone who understands your challenges. Mentors provide the benefit of experience and can help guide you through difficult cases. Don’t overlook feedback from judges and opponents - their perspectives can reveal how your arguments were received and highlight areas for refinement.
In an early episode of The Advocacy Podcast, Ian Robertson SC (Senior Counsel, Australia) pointed out that even Roger Federer has a coach. A coach can help you refine your advocacy technique in the same way they do for elite athletes, breaking down complex skills and offering precise, actionable feedback. Coaches offer an objective perspective that you might miss on your own, helping you sharpen your cross-examinations, arguments, and witness handling.
Advocates are trained and not born. Everyone, from pupil barristers to silks, can become a more powerful advocate with the same relentless pursuit of mastery and stretching found in elite athletes. As barristers, our stakes are incredibly high; however, we can level the playing field by taking notes from our favourite sports stars.
By adopting principles from elite athletes, barristers can elevate their courtroom performance through deeper case analysis and performance reviews, says Bibi Badejo
Barbara Mills KC, the new Chair of the Bar, outlines some key themes and priorities
Casey Randall explores what makes AlphaBiolabs the industry leader for court-admissible DNA testing
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
A family lawyer has won a £500 donation for her preferred charity, an education centre for women from disadvantaged backgrounds, thanks to drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs’ Giving Back campaign
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management highlights some of the ways you can cut your IHT bill
Rachel Davenport breaks down everything you need to know about AlphaBiolabs’ industry-leading laboratory testing services for legal matters
What's it like being a legal trainee at the Crown Prosecution Service? Amy describes what drew her to the role, the skills required and a typical day in the life
Barbara Mills KC wants to raise the profile of the family Bar. She also wants to improve wellbeing and enhance equality, diversity and inclusion in the profession. She talks to Joshua Rozenberg KC (hon) about her plans for the year ahead
Are Birmingham’s Intensive Supervision Courts successfully turning women offenders’ lives around? Chloe Ashley talks to District Judge Michelle Smith
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC identify good value bottles across the price spectrum – from festive fizz to reliable reds
Governments who play fast and loose with the law get into real trouble, says the new Attorney General. The Rt Hon Lord Hermer KC talks to Anthony Inglese CB about what drew this boy from Cardiff to the Bar, bringing the barrister ethos to the front bench, and how he will be measuring success
