*/
The criminal Bar should be reduced to “a size where it can thrive”, allowing for competition and for each successful advocate to have enough work to provide an acceptable living, the Attorney General has counselled.
Speaking at the launch of the new Bar Standards Board Handbook in January, Dominic Grieve QC MP said that “the crux of the matter for Advocates (QASA) nor legal aid reform, but “the increasing number of criminal advocates, at a time when the volume of cases available to them is falling”.
Crime continues to fall yet at the same time there has been a steady increase in the
number of barristers at the self-employed Bar. “The Bar has to focus on how to manage the process of bringing the criminal Bar down to a sustainable size. I know this is not an easy matter but it is not one we can shirk.”
On QASA, the Attorney General supported “any process that helps to promote and bolster the high standards of which the criminal Bar is rightly proud, and which weeds out those who are not able to achieve them”. Whilst the Divisional Court judgment recognised problems with process and implementation, “that is inevitable and certainly not indicative of a fundamental flaw in the principle of assessment”.
“For a profession like ours which prides itself on quality, to refuse to be assessed does not strengthen our cause, and indeed is in my view completely counter- productive.”
On legal aid reform, he said: “While there are savings to be made through greater efficiency in the justice system, for example through increasing digitisation and use of video technology, these do not provide complete alternatives to legal aid reform.”
His advice to the Bar was to embrace the new – such as alternative business structures (ABS) – whilst preserving the best of the past and safeguarding its ethical standards.
“Working creatively and thinking beyond traditional constraints, chambers and their members can be at the forefront of ABS advance. Some have viewed these changes with deep misgiving; could this work be carried out while maintaining ethical standards? I believe the Handbook and new Code of Conduct allow this,” he said.
Barristers should also look to opportunities abroad: the overseas market is “hungry for those educated and experienced in our system of justice and jurisprudence”.
The Handbook was welcomed as a “substantial work of consolidation and updating” which would “ultimately place practitioners in a much stronger position to face the future”, whilst acknowledging that “some in the profession may not immediately recognise the value of it”.
The Attorney General concluded: “The reputation of the Bar will continue to depend
on its ethical standards and its professional expertise. Despite the current challenges to which I have referred, and while we must accept that some change is necessary, I see no reason why the Bar should not continue to thrive as it has done for the last seven centuries.”
Sir Bill Jeffrey’s review of the provision of independent criminal advocacy – which is due to report at the end of March – would be “crucial” in this context, he added. The criminal Bar was also advised to consider significant changes by the Legal Services Board in its submission to the Jeffrey Review. It said that criminal barristers should look to form ABSs with employed solicitors and employ paralegals to undertake work at lower cost, but that there should not be any attempt “to force people into new business models who believe that they can make a more traditional pattern of practice pay”.
The latest Bar Barometer shows that the number of practising barristers continues to increase, to 15,585 in 2012, including 12,680 at the self-employed Bar.
Crime continues to fall yet at the same time there has been a steady increase in the
number of barristers at the self-employed Bar. “The Bar has to focus on how to manage the process of bringing the criminal Bar down to a sustainable size. I know this is not an easy matter but it is not one we can shirk.”
On QASA, the Attorney General supported “any process that helps to promote and bolster the high standards of which the criminal Bar is rightly proud, and which weeds out those who are not able to achieve them”. Whilst the Divisional Court judgment recognised problems with process and implementation, “that is inevitable and certainly not indicative of a fundamental flaw in the principle of assessment”.
“For a profession like ours which prides itself on quality, to refuse to be assessed does not strengthen our cause, and indeed is in my view completely counter- productive.”
On legal aid reform, he said: “While there are savings to be made through greater efficiency in the justice system, for example through increasing digitisation and use of video technology, these do not provide complete alternatives to legal aid reform.”
His advice to the Bar was to embrace the new – such as alternative business structures (ABS) – whilst preserving the best of the past and safeguarding its ethical standards.
“Working creatively and thinking beyond traditional constraints, chambers and their members can be at the forefront of ABS advance. Some have viewed these changes with deep misgiving; could this work be carried out while maintaining ethical standards? I believe the Handbook and new Code of Conduct allow this,” he said.
Barristers should also look to opportunities abroad: the overseas market is “hungry for those educated and experienced in our system of justice and jurisprudence”.
The Handbook was welcomed as a “substantial work of consolidation and updating” which would “ultimately place practitioners in a much stronger position to face the future”, whilst acknowledging that “some in the profession may not immediately recognise the value of it”.
The Attorney General concluded: “The reputation of the Bar will continue to depend
on its ethical standards and its professional expertise. Despite the current challenges to which I have referred, and while we must accept that some change is necessary, I see no reason why the Bar should not continue to thrive as it has done for the last seven centuries.”
Sir Bill Jeffrey’s review of the provision of independent criminal advocacy – which is due to report at the end of March – would be “crucial” in this context, he added. The criminal Bar was also advised to consider significant changes by the Legal Services Board in its submission to the Jeffrey Review. It said that criminal barristers should look to form ABSs with employed solicitors and employ paralegals to undertake work at lower cost, but that there should not be any attempt “to force people into new business models who believe that they can make a more traditional pattern of practice pay”.
The latest Bar Barometer shows that the number of practising barristers continues to increase, to 15,585 in 2012, including 12,680 at the self-employed Bar.
The criminal Bar should be reduced to “a size where it can thrive”, allowing for competition and for each successful advocate to have enough work to provide an acceptable living, the Attorney General has counselled.
Speaking at the launch of the new Bar Standards Board Handbook in January, Dominic Grieve QC MP said that “the crux of the matter for Advocates (QASA) nor legal aid reform, but “the increasing number of criminal advocates, at a time when the volume of cases available to them is falling”.
Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights some of the key achievements at the Bar Council this year
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management highlights some of the ways you can cut your IHT bill
Rachel Davenport breaks down everything you need to know about AlphaBiolabs’ industry-leading laboratory testing services for legal matters
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
Mark Neale, Director General of the Bar Standards Board, offers an update on the Equality Rules consultation
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Imposing a professional obligation to act in a way that advances equality, diversity and inclusion is the wrong way to achieve this ambition, says Nick Vineall KC
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
