*/
The criminal Bar should be reduced to “a size where it can thrive”, allowing for competition and for each successful advocate to have enough work to provide an acceptable living, the Attorney General has counselled.
Speaking at the launch of the new Bar Standards Board Handbook in January, Dominic Grieve QC MP said that “the crux of the matter for Advocates (QASA) nor legal aid reform, but “the increasing number of criminal advocates, at a time when the volume of cases available to them is falling”.
Crime continues to fall yet at the same time there has been a steady increase in the
number of barristers at the self-employed Bar. “The Bar has to focus on how to manage the process of bringing the criminal Bar down to a sustainable size. I know this is not an easy matter but it is not one we can shirk.”
On QASA, the Attorney General supported “any process that helps to promote and bolster the high standards of which the criminal Bar is rightly proud, and which weeds out those who are not able to achieve them”. Whilst the Divisional Court judgment recognised problems with process and implementation, “that is inevitable and certainly not indicative of a fundamental flaw in the principle of assessment”.
“For a profession like ours which prides itself on quality, to refuse to be assessed does not strengthen our cause, and indeed is in my view completely counter- productive.”
On legal aid reform, he said: “While there are savings to be made through greater efficiency in the justice system, for example through increasing digitisation and use of video technology, these do not provide complete alternatives to legal aid reform.”
His advice to the Bar was to embrace the new – such as alternative business structures (ABS) – whilst preserving the best of the past and safeguarding its ethical standards.
“Working creatively and thinking beyond traditional constraints, chambers and their members can be at the forefront of ABS advance. Some have viewed these changes with deep misgiving; could this work be carried out while maintaining ethical standards? I believe the Handbook and new Code of Conduct allow this,” he said.
Barristers should also look to opportunities abroad: the overseas market is “hungry for those educated and experienced in our system of justice and jurisprudence”.
The Handbook was welcomed as a “substantial work of consolidation and updating” which would “ultimately place practitioners in a much stronger position to face the future”, whilst acknowledging that “some in the profession may not immediately recognise the value of it”.
The Attorney General concluded: “The reputation of the Bar will continue to depend
on its ethical standards and its professional expertise. Despite the current challenges to which I have referred, and while we must accept that some change is necessary, I see no reason why the Bar should not continue to thrive as it has done for the last seven centuries.”
Sir Bill Jeffrey’s review of the provision of independent criminal advocacy – which is due to report at the end of March – would be “crucial” in this context, he added. The criminal Bar was also advised to consider significant changes by the Legal Services Board in its submission to the Jeffrey Review. It said that criminal barristers should look to form ABSs with employed solicitors and employ paralegals to undertake work at lower cost, but that there should not be any attempt “to force people into new business models who believe that they can make a more traditional pattern of practice pay”.
The latest Bar Barometer shows that the number of practising barristers continues to increase, to 15,585 in 2012, including 12,680 at the self-employed Bar.
Crime continues to fall yet at the same time there has been a steady increase in the
number of barristers at the self-employed Bar. “The Bar has to focus on how to manage the process of bringing the criminal Bar down to a sustainable size. I know this is not an easy matter but it is not one we can shirk.”
On QASA, the Attorney General supported “any process that helps to promote and bolster the high standards of which the criminal Bar is rightly proud, and which weeds out those who are not able to achieve them”. Whilst the Divisional Court judgment recognised problems with process and implementation, “that is inevitable and certainly not indicative of a fundamental flaw in the principle of assessment”.
“For a profession like ours which prides itself on quality, to refuse to be assessed does not strengthen our cause, and indeed is in my view completely counter- productive.”
On legal aid reform, he said: “While there are savings to be made through greater efficiency in the justice system, for example through increasing digitisation and use of video technology, these do not provide complete alternatives to legal aid reform.”
His advice to the Bar was to embrace the new – such as alternative business structures (ABS) – whilst preserving the best of the past and safeguarding its ethical standards.
“Working creatively and thinking beyond traditional constraints, chambers and their members can be at the forefront of ABS advance. Some have viewed these changes with deep misgiving; could this work be carried out while maintaining ethical standards? I believe the Handbook and new Code of Conduct allow this,” he said.
Barristers should also look to opportunities abroad: the overseas market is “hungry for those educated and experienced in our system of justice and jurisprudence”.
The Handbook was welcomed as a “substantial work of consolidation and updating” which would “ultimately place practitioners in a much stronger position to face the future”, whilst acknowledging that “some in the profession may not immediately recognise the value of it”.
The Attorney General concluded: “The reputation of the Bar will continue to depend
on its ethical standards and its professional expertise. Despite the current challenges to which I have referred, and while we must accept that some change is necessary, I see no reason why the Bar should not continue to thrive as it has done for the last seven centuries.”
Sir Bill Jeffrey’s review of the provision of independent criminal advocacy – which is due to report at the end of March – would be “crucial” in this context, he added. The criminal Bar was also advised to consider significant changes by the Legal Services Board in its submission to the Jeffrey Review. It said that criminal barristers should look to form ABSs with employed solicitors and employ paralegals to undertake work at lower cost, but that there should not be any attempt “to force people into new business models who believe that they can make a more traditional pattern of practice pay”.
The latest Bar Barometer shows that the number of practising barristers continues to increase, to 15,585 in 2012, including 12,680 at the self-employed Bar.
The criminal Bar should be reduced to “a size where it can thrive”, allowing for competition and for each successful advocate to have enough work to provide an acceptable living, the Attorney General has counselled.
Speaking at the launch of the new Bar Standards Board Handbook in January, Dominic Grieve QC MP said that “the crux of the matter for Advocates (QASA) nor legal aid reform, but “the increasing number of criminal advocates, at a time when the volume of cases available to them is falling”.
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
