*/
A practical guide by defence and prosecution
Deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs), a relatively recent addition to the UK criminal justice toolkit, allow a company which has committed a criminal offence to avoid prosecution if it complies with a range of conditions, including a hefty financial penalty.
The specialist panel, moderated by Stuart Alford QC, offered a crash course in practical language that even tired brains could understand.
Sir Edward Garnier QC MP described DPAs as an idea born from austerity. Prosecuting complex crime is expensive and time-consuming, so he looked to the US’s experience in dealing with corporate wrongdoing. The provisions in the Crime and Courts Act 2013 resemble the US model, but there is one principal difference: the UK model involves active judicial supervision of the agreement. This element was essential for the legislation to obtain political, judicial and public support.
Ben Morgan gave an insight into what the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is looking for when considering a DPA. In short, a company should approach the SFO early, investigate wrongdoing fully and openly and be as forthcoming as possible about the facts. Winning does not mean defeating your opponent; it means securing court approval for a DPA. Ultimately, the court can only approve a DPA if it is in the interests of justice and the terms are fair, reasonable and proportionate. This balance can be very difficult to achieve. On the one hand, there must be a punishment for wrongdoing. On the other hand, it is in the interest of employees, pensioners and suppliers for the company to remain a going concern, and there must be some incentive for the company to self-report.
Alison Levitt QC argued that the need for early self-reporting poses a challenge for companies. Once a company has self-reported, there is no going back. In practice, companies are likely to begin with their own investigation, followed by a risk assessment of whether the wrongdoing will ever be discovered. They will also be mindful of the risk of prosecution in other countries; although the SFO can work with its counterparts in other countries to avoid duplicate proceedings, there are no binding treaties so there remains a risk of international prosecution. Her advice was to investigate potential wrongdoing early and comprehensively, using external lawyers. As soon as there is a reasonable suspicion of criminal acts, the company cannot procrastinate. If a DPA is sought, companies must prepare to negotiate a sufficient discount on the financial penalty to make the risk worth taking.
The session left me with a good basic knowledge of DPAs and an idea of where to look if I need to know more. What more could I ask in an hour?
Contributor Aoife Drudy
Aoife is an employed barrister with the Government Legal Department and a member of the Counsel Editorial Board
The specialist panel, moderated by Stuart Alford QC, offered a crash course in practical language that even tired brains could understand.
Sir Edward Garnier QC MP described DPAs as an idea born from austerity. Prosecuting complex crime is expensive and time-consuming, so he looked to the US’s experience in dealing with corporate wrongdoing. The provisions in the Crime and Courts Act 2013 resemble the US model, but there is one principal difference: the UK model involves active judicial supervision of the agreement. This element was essential for the legislation to obtain political, judicial and public support.
Ben Morgan gave an insight into what the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) is looking for when considering a DPA. In short, a company should approach the SFO early, investigate wrongdoing fully and openly and be as forthcoming as possible about the facts. Winning does not mean defeating your opponent; it means securing court approval for a DPA. Ultimately, the court can only approve a DPA if it is in the interests of justice and the terms are fair, reasonable and proportionate. This balance can be very difficult to achieve. On the one hand, there must be a punishment for wrongdoing. On the other hand, it is in the interest of employees, pensioners and suppliers for the company to remain a going concern, and there must be some incentive for the company to self-report.
Alison Levitt QC argued that the need for early self-reporting poses a challenge for companies. Once a company has self-reported, there is no going back. In practice, companies are likely to begin with their own investigation, followed by a risk assessment of whether the wrongdoing will ever be discovered. They will also be mindful of the risk of prosecution in other countries; although the SFO can work with its counterparts in other countries to avoid duplicate proceedings, there are no binding treaties so there remains a risk of international prosecution. Her advice was to investigate potential wrongdoing early and comprehensively, using external lawyers. As soon as there is a reasonable suspicion of criminal acts, the company cannot procrastinate. If a DPA is sought, companies must prepare to negotiate a sufficient discount on the financial penalty to make the risk worth taking.
The session left me with a good basic knowledge of DPAs and an idea of where to look if I need to know more. What more could I ask in an hour?
Contributor Aoife Drudy
A practical guide by defence and prosecution
Deferred prosecution agreements (DPAs), a relatively recent addition to the UK criminal justice toolkit, allow a company which has committed a criminal offence to avoid prosecution if it complies with a range of conditions, including a hefty financial penalty.
Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights some of the key achievements at the Bar Council this year
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management highlights some of the ways you can cut your IHT bill
Rachel Davenport breaks down everything you need to know about AlphaBiolabs’ industry-leading laboratory testing services for legal matters
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
Mark Neale, Director General of the Bar Standards Board, offers an update on the Equality Rules consultation
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Imposing a professional obligation to act in a way that advances equality, diversity and inclusion is the wrong way to achieve this ambition, says Nick Vineall KC
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
