*/
“The truth is that publicly perceived and generally accepted social and moral standards change, and, within limits, the legislature and the courts must reflect those changes, if they are to retain democratic relevance and public confidence”, said the new Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, at the 2009 Denning Lecture.
Speaking on the topic of “Rights and Responsibilities: Civic Duty and the Rule of Law”, Lord Neuberger stressed the importance of performing a balancing act. “What a sixty years it has been”, he noted since Lord Denning himself defined freedom in 1949 as “the freedom of every law-abiding citizen to think what he will, to say what he will, and to go where he will on his lawful occasion without let or hindrance from other persons”.
Lord Neuberger stated that there are “immutable” values although it is impossible to be didactic or precise as to the extent of these core values. He however was able to name several. Chief amongst rights and responsibilities are the right of a fair trial as a “substantive, free standing right”, the right to liberty and security (including the “right to privacy” which the courts have shoe-horned into the law of confidence), and freedom of expression, which is “the means by which truth is told to power”. Rights and responsibilities though need respect (“the more we think of them as being well established, the greater the danger of our taking them for granted”). “Human rights may have a long history,” he noted “but their universal acceptance remains an ongoing project”. It is here that the judiciary and politicians have to strike a balance between rights and responsibilities—how to balance one right against another, how to balance a right against its “internal limits” and how to balance it against an overarching need to protect the very life of the nation”.
He recognised that the courts have double duties, eg not only not to act inconsistently with the right to a fair trial but also positively to secure a fair trial. He concluded by endorsing the views of his famous predecessor that when the interests of freedom are “nicely balanced” against the duties which restrict them, “the scale goes down on the side of freedom”.
The 2009 Denning Lecture was given at a BACFI meeting on 23 November 2009.
Lord Neuberger stated that there are “immutable” values although it is impossible to be didactic or precise as to the extent of these core values. He however was able to name several. Chief amongst rights and responsibilities are the right of a fair trial as a “substantive, free standing right”, the right to liberty and security (including the “right to privacy” which the courts have shoe-horned into the law of confidence), and freedom of expression, which is “the means by which truth is told to power”. Rights and responsibilities though need respect (“the more we think of them as being well established, the greater the danger of our taking them for granted”). “Human rights may have a long history,” he noted “but their universal acceptance remains an ongoing project”. It is here that the judiciary and politicians have to strike a balance between rights and responsibilities—how to balance one right against another, how to balance a right against its “internal limits” and how to balance it against an overarching need to protect the very life of the nation”.
He recognised that the courts have double duties, eg not only not to act inconsistently with the right to a fair trial but also positively to secure a fair trial. He concluded by endorsing the views of his famous predecessor that when the interests of freedom are “nicely balanced” against the duties which restrict them, “the scale goes down on the side of freedom”.
The 2009 Denning Lecture was given at a BACFI meeting on 23 November 2009.
“The truth is that publicly perceived and generally accepted social and moral standards change, and, within limits, the legislature and the courts must reflect those changes, if they are to retain democratic relevance and public confidence”, said the new Master of the Rolls, Lord Neuberger of Abbotsbury, at the 2009 Denning Lecture.
Speaking on the topic of “Rights and Responsibilities: Civic Duty and the Rule of Law”, Lord Neuberger stressed the importance of performing a balancing act. “What a sixty years it has been”, he noted since Lord Denning himself defined freedom in 1949 as “the freedom of every law-abiding citizen to think what he will, to say what he will, and to go where he will on his lawful occasion without let or hindrance from other persons”.
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
In the first of a new series, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth considers the fundamental need for financial protection
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Possibly, but many barristers are glad he did…
Mental health charity Mind BWW has received a £500 donation from drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs as part of its Giving Back campaign
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law is thrilled to announce its inaugural essay competition
How to navigate open source evidence in an era of deepfakes. By Professor Yvonne McDermott Rees and Professor Alexa Koenig
Brie Stevens-Hoare KC and Lyndsey de Mestre KC take a look at the difficulties women encounter during the menopause, and offer some practical tips for individuals and chambers to make things easier
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice since January 2021, is well known for his passion for access to justice and all things digital. Perhaps less widely known is the driven personality and wanderlust that lies behind this, as Anthony Inglese CB discovers
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
No-one should have to live in sub-standard accommodation, says Antony Hodari Solicitors. We are tackling the problem of bad housing with a two-pronged approach and act on behalf of tenants in both the civil and criminal courts