*/
The Supreme Court has ruled that the unilateral removal of a child to an overseas jurisdiction by one parent did not cause the child to lose English habitual residence, and that the English court retained full jurisdiction to make decisions about their welfare.
The Supreme Court has ruled that the unilateral removal of a child to an overseas jurisdiction by one parent did not cause the child to lose English habitual residence, and that the English court retained full jurisdiction to make decisions about their welfare.
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
In the first of a new series, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth considers the fundamental need for financial protection
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Possibly, but many barristers are glad he did…
Mental health charity Mind BWW has received a £500 donation from drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs as part of its Giving Back campaign
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law is thrilled to announce its inaugural essay competition
The Chair of the Bar launches a Manifesto for Justice as campaigning gets under way
How best to prepare for your foreign language clients to ensure fairness and avoid strike out? The onus is on counsel to be alive to language issues, says Oliver Foy, who offers a cautionary case and practical tips