*/
Work is continuing on the Bar’s proposed self-funding civil justice scheme to “deal with nuts and bolts” ahead of Lord Justice Jackson’s final recommendations on litigation costs.
The Contingent Legal Aid Fund (“CLAF”) would be a self-financing pool of money used for civil claims where legal aid money was not available. Investors in the pool could see a return on their money.
Guy Mansfield QC, who is leading the group developing the CLAF, said they were looking at how it would be constructed in terms of legislation, how they would fund someone to run it, how they would manage costs, case selection criteria, and how much money would be needed up front. Mansfield emphasised the fund “should not be seen as a Trojan horse to take legal aid away from other cases” and would be an addition to, not a substitute for, legal aid funding.
However, the fund will not work if conditional fee arrangements (“CFAs”) continue in their present form. Lord Justice Jackson has hinted he may propose changes to the CFA regime when he delivers his recommendations, expected in December. In May 2009 Lord Justice Jackson published his preliminary report in his Review of Civil Litigation Costs. The report stated: “Following the retraction of legal aid, either CFAs or some other system of payment by results (contingent fee agreements, CLAF, SLAS, third party funding agreements etc) must exist in order to facilitate access to justice.”
The Contingent Legal Aid Fund (“CLAF”) would be a self-financing pool of money used for civil claims where legal aid money was not available. Investors in the pool could see a return on their money.
Guy Mansfield QC, who is leading the group developing the CLAF, said they were looking at how it would be constructed in terms of legislation, how they would fund someone to run it, how they would manage costs, case selection criteria, and how much money would be needed up front. Mansfield emphasised the fund “should not be seen as a Trojan horse to take legal aid away from other cases” and would be an addition to, not a substitute for, legal aid funding.
However, the fund will not work if conditional fee arrangements (“CFAs”) continue in their present form. Lord Justice Jackson has hinted he may propose changes to the CFA regime when he delivers his recommendations, expected in December. In May 2009 Lord Justice Jackson published his preliminary report in his Review of Civil Litigation Costs. The report stated: “Following the retraction of legal aid, either CFAs or some other system of payment by results (contingent fee agreements, CLAF, SLAS, third party funding agreements etc) must exist in order to facilitate access to justice.”
Work is continuing on the Bar’s proposed self-funding civil justice scheme to “deal with nuts and bolts” ahead of Lord Justice Jackson’s final recommendations on litigation costs.
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
