*/
Cryptoassets are mainstream these days: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) reported a rise of 400,000 investors since March 2020, and 2.3 million UK adults now hold cryptoassets. This brings opportunity for fraudsters who target cryptoassets or use crypto to dissipate assets from any fraud. Our collaboration with Asset Reality and Chainalysis will help support the ecosystem of this revolutionary technology by providing a streamlined in-house cradle-to-grave investigation and asset recovery service.
The recovery of misappropriated cryptoassets has many success stories, but this has not yet deterred criminals, and we have seen adaptation to the changing environment as enforcement agencies and asset recovery specialists flex their muscles. Ransomware attacks were reportedly up 311% between 2019 and 2020, with USD350 million paid by victims.* The number is likely to be far higher when you consider thwarted and unreported attacks. Individual payments to wallet addresses known for scams are up from 5 million to 7.3 million in the same period; a 48% increase in victims.* Criminals are using mixers and tumblers to obfuscate their trails, and even pose as an asset recovery specialist or a party connected to a bad actor. Some victims are so overcome from the first attack that they will seize on any hope, often paying the price a second time.
It is not that different. Blockchain analysis allows us to trace the flow of funds through an unlimited number of hops (akin to having every bank statement you need). Some working in this space can be too focused on this element and there are benefits to applying more ‘traditional’ asset tracing techniques to broaden the scope of the investigation. Corporate intelligence skills, including the use of OSINT, domain name investigations and social media capture can help identify ‘real world’ targets. Receiverships or insolvency procedures bring significant powers of investigation and a wide range of recovery actions.
There is a strong appetite within UK government agencies to get to grips with this trend. Met Police seizures have proven that these assets are traceable, storable and sellable. Our webinars with HMRC, the National Crime Agency and the Insolvency Service are among the most popular we have ever held. Judging by the recent report of HMRC sending ‘nudge’ letters to crypto investors over unpaid tax, it is just a matter of time before they will be on the cryptoasset seizure leaderboard. We are still in the ‘temporary registration regime’ stage of regulation so it is probably premature to talk about stronger regulation. The vast majority of cryptoasset use is for legitimate purposes and, given the huge variation in government approaches across the world, the UK has an opportunity to support this nascent space and derive the economic benefits. The real issue is how government agencies and asset recovery professionals will be empowered to pursue criminals, who find victims on social media platforms safe in the knowledge that tech giants are ineffective gate-keepers. The Online Safety Bill is interesting; the government has agreed to tackle online scams following pressure from the FCA and others, although not fraud via advertising, emails or cloned websites.
Maintaining this status will rely on a collective will to support the cryptoasset ecosystem and bring it further into the mainstream. The decentralised nature of crypto may make it resistant to traditional regulation, but it behoves all levels of investor to have some sort of recourse in the event of fraud. More streamlined and cost-effective investigation and asset recovery can help, and CFAAR (the network of lawyers, forensic accountants, corporate intelligence and asset recovery professionals focused on crypto fraud and asset recovery) will encourage a collaborative mindset focused on enforcing the judgments of our courts and achieving restitution for victims.
Carmel King is a Director in Grant Thornton UK LLP’s Insolvency and Asset Recovery practice, and a founding member of CFAAR, with more than 15 years’ experience in recovering funds for clients who have suffered a financial loss as a result of fraud.
Cryptoassets are mainstream these days: the Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) reported a rise of 400,000 investors since March 2020, and 2.3 million UK adults now hold cryptoassets. This brings opportunity for fraudsters who target cryptoassets or use crypto to dissipate assets from any fraud. Our collaboration with Asset Reality and Chainalysis will help support the ecosystem of this revolutionary technology by providing a streamlined in-house cradle-to-grave investigation and asset recovery service.
The recovery of misappropriated cryptoassets has many success stories, but this has not yet deterred criminals, and we have seen adaptation to the changing environment as enforcement agencies and asset recovery specialists flex their muscles. Ransomware attacks were reportedly up 311% between 2019 and 2020, with USD350 million paid by victims.* The number is likely to be far higher when you consider thwarted and unreported attacks. Individual payments to wallet addresses known for scams are up from 5 million to 7.3 million in the same period; a 48% increase in victims.* Criminals are using mixers and tumblers to obfuscate their trails, and even pose as an asset recovery specialist or a party connected to a bad actor. Some victims are so overcome from the first attack that they will seize on any hope, often paying the price a second time.
It is not that different. Blockchain analysis allows us to trace the flow of funds through an unlimited number of hops (akin to having every bank statement you need). Some working in this space can be too focused on this element and there are benefits to applying more ‘traditional’ asset tracing techniques to broaden the scope of the investigation. Corporate intelligence skills, including the use of OSINT, domain name investigations and social media capture can help identify ‘real world’ targets. Receiverships or insolvency procedures bring significant powers of investigation and a wide range of recovery actions.
There is a strong appetite within UK government agencies to get to grips with this trend. Met Police seizures have proven that these assets are traceable, storable and sellable. Our webinars with HMRC, the National Crime Agency and the Insolvency Service are among the most popular we have ever held. Judging by the recent report of HMRC sending ‘nudge’ letters to crypto investors over unpaid tax, it is just a matter of time before they will be on the cryptoasset seizure leaderboard. We are still in the ‘temporary registration regime’ stage of regulation so it is probably premature to talk about stronger regulation. The vast majority of cryptoasset use is for legitimate purposes and, given the huge variation in government approaches across the world, the UK has an opportunity to support this nascent space and derive the economic benefits. The real issue is how government agencies and asset recovery professionals will be empowered to pursue criminals, who find victims on social media platforms safe in the knowledge that tech giants are ineffective gate-keepers. The Online Safety Bill is interesting; the government has agreed to tackle online scams following pressure from the FCA and others, although not fraud via advertising, emails or cloned websites.
Maintaining this status will rely on a collective will to support the cryptoasset ecosystem and bring it further into the mainstream. The decentralised nature of crypto may make it resistant to traditional regulation, but it behoves all levels of investor to have some sort of recourse in the event of fraud. More streamlined and cost-effective investigation and asset recovery can help, and CFAAR (the network of lawyers, forensic accountants, corporate intelligence and asset recovery professionals focused on crypto fraud and asset recovery) will encourage a collaborative mindset focused on enforcing the judgments of our courts and achieving restitution for victims.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
