*/
In the first of six Gresham College lectures on family law, Divorce Law: A Disaster? , Baroness Deech of Cumnor DBE outlined the cost of divorce in financial and emotional terms, and called for a “new debate on marriage and the family under the umbrella of moral and civic renewal”, although she accepted that it was “unlikely to provide any consensus.” “
Divorce is not a private matter, it is of real public concern and cost, with a ripple effect on the family, the community and the whole country,” she said.
“So public attitudes have to be changed, just as they have been in relation to environmental issues and smoking, with greater or lesser success.”
She recommended that divorcing couples should be made to endure a 12 month waiting period in order to hold or reverse the rise in divorce.
“My own remedy would be an introduction of a waiting period to stop divorce being so quickly granted, even where the ground is one of the speedy ones,” she said.
“I would add to the present grounds of divorce a provision that no decree shall be granted until at least 12 months have elapsed from the service of the petition (the start of the formalities). This would ensure that no petitioner would be free to remarry for at least one year after the beginning of the process, regardless of the reasons for the divorce.”
Baroness Ruth Deech, who is professor of law at Gresham College and Chair of the Bar Standards Board, said that divorce often has a lasting impact on children, yet this is not taken seriously by politicians.
“It is astonishing that no government seriously considers divorce as an issue while expressing anxiety about single parents, their children and society’s health.”
Mediation had “not worked as well as might be hoped” and was unlikely to hold down the rate of divorce, she added.
“Women are reported to feel disadvantaged by mediation.
“This is because mediation seeks a compromise or agreement, and favours the articulate and determined over the cowed and quiet, apparently, and it is said female mediators are more persuaded by husbands’ arguments than wives’”.
She also said that women should “be educated to face [divorce], and it is no solution to the material and psychological problems to expect them all to rely on ex-husbands”.
Baroness Deech’s next speech will take place on 13 October.
Divorce is not a private matter, it is of real public concern and cost, with a ripple effect on the family, the community and the whole country,” she said.
“So public attitudes have to be changed, just as they have been in relation to environmental issues and smoking, with greater or lesser success.”
She recommended that divorcing couples should be made to endure a 12 month waiting period in order to hold or reverse the rise in divorce.
“My own remedy would be an introduction of a waiting period to stop divorce being so quickly granted, even where the ground is one of the speedy ones,” she said.
“I would add to the present grounds of divorce a provision that no decree shall be granted until at least 12 months have elapsed from the service of the petition (the start of the formalities). This would ensure that no petitioner would be free to remarry for at least one year after the beginning of the process, regardless of the reasons for the divorce.”
Baroness Ruth Deech, who is professor of law at Gresham College and Chair of the Bar Standards Board, said that divorce often has a lasting impact on children, yet this is not taken seriously by politicians.
“It is astonishing that no government seriously considers divorce as an issue while expressing anxiety about single parents, their children and society’s health.”
Mediation had “not worked as well as might be hoped” and was unlikely to hold down the rate of divorce, she added.
“Women are reported to feel disadvantaged by mediation.
“This is because mediation seeks a compromise or agreement, and favours the articulate and determined over the cowed and quiet, apparently, and it is said female mediators are more persuaded by husbands’ arguments than wives’”.
She also said that women should “be educated to face [divorce], and it is no solution to the material and psychological problems to expect them all to rely on ex-husbands”.
Baroness Deech’s next speech will take place on 13 October.
In the first of six Gresham College lectures on family law, Divorce Law: A Disaster?, Baroness Deech of Cumnor DBE outlined the cost of divorce in financial and emotional terms, and called for a “new debate on marriage and the family under the umbrella of moral and civic renewal”, although she accepted that it was “unlikely to provide any consensus.” “
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
In the first of a new series, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth considers the fundamental need for financial protection
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Possibly, but many barristers are glad he did…
Mental health charity Mind BWW has received a £500 donation from drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs as part of its Giving Back campaign
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law is thrilled to announce its inaugural essay competition
How to navigate open source evidence in an era of deepfakes. By Professor Yvonne McDermott Rees and Professor Alexa Koenig
Brie Stevens-Hoare KC and Lyndsey de Mestre KC take a look at the difficulties women encounter during the menopause, and offer some practical tips for individuals and chambers to make things easier
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice since January 2021, is well known for his passion for access to justice and all things digital. Perhaps less widely known is the driven personality and wanderlust that lies behind this, as Anthony Inglese CB discovers
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
No-one should have to live in sub-standard accommodation, says Antony Hodari Solicitors. We are tackling the problem of bad housing with a two-pronged approach and act on behalf of tenants in both the civil and criminal courts