*/
Family law barristers have joined with the NSPCC to call for an urgent Parliamentary inquiry into the state of the family justice system. A coalition, including the Bar Council and Family Law Bar Association, have written to the chair of the House of Commons Justice Select Committee, Alan Beith MP, calling for an inquiry into the impact of repeated cuts in the family justice system.
The letter refers to The Work of the Family Bar, research commissioned by the Family Law Bar Association, and describes the profession as “close to breaking point as it struggles to cope with increasingly complex caseloads, the pressure to protect the interests of vulnerable clients, disruptive patterns of work and repeated cuts in pay.”
The “week-in-a-life” study, carried out by Dr Debora Price and Anne Laybourne of the King’s Institute for the Study of Public Policy, analysed data from 1,610 barristers in 133 chambers and involved 5,012 pieces of work, 40% of which was undertaken under legal aid graduated fees.
The respondents were specialists: 75% spent 75% of their time on family law; half (the more senior) particularly specialised in ancillary relief or public law [children] work. Half worked more than 46 hours a week, and a quarter more than 56 hours per week, with median taxable profits of £66,000. Half earned less than £39,000 on legal aid work, in which hourly gross rates are £57.
Speaking at the launch of the research last month, Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “Barristers are not asking for more money.” The concern is the impact of the “abhorrent” cuts by the Legal Services Commission of £6.5m in counsel’s fees in children’s cases, which have just taken effect. Further cuts of up to £20–30m (more than a 50% cut in many complex cases) are likely to follow, as a result of the consultation Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010 (December 2008). The last time the LSC imposed substantial changes in family legal aid, in 2001, 28% of the family Bar stopped doing publicly funded ancillary relief hearings, the research showed. It is common now for those above 15 years’ call to refuse legally aided work.
Chair of the Family Law Bar Association, Lucy Theis QC, pointed out that “expertise in family law is not gained overnight” and these cuts will “drive expertise away, which is not in the public interest”.
The letter refers to The Work of the Family Bar, research commissioned by the Family Law Bar Association, and describes the profession as “close to breaking point as it struggles to cope with increasingly complex caseloads, the pressure to protect the interests of vulnerable clients, disruptive patterns of work and repeated cuts in pay.”
The “week-in-a-life” study, carried out by Dr Debora Price and Anne Laybourne of the King’s Institute for the Study of Public Policy, analysed data from 1,610 barristers in 133 chambers and involved 5,012 pieces of work, 40% of which was undertaken under legal aid graduated fees.
The respondents were specialists: 75% spent 75% of their time on family law; half (the more senior) particularly specialised in ancillary relief or public law [children] work. Half worked more than 46 hours a week, and a quarter more than 56 hours per week, with median taxable profits of £66,000. Half earned less than £39,000 on legal aid work, in which hourly gross rates are £57.
Speaking at the launch of the research last month, Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “Barristers are not asking for more money.” The concern is the impact of the “abhorrent” cuts by the Legal Services Commission of £6.5m in counsel’s fees in children’s cases, which have just taken effect. Further cuts of up to £20–30m (more than a 50% cut in many complex cases) are likely to follow, as a result of the consultation Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010 (December 2008). The last time the LSC imposed substantial changes in family legal aid, in 2001, 28% of the family Bar stopped doing publicly funded ancillary relief hearings, the research showed. It is common now for those above 15 years’ call to refuse legally aided work.
Chair of the Family Law Bar Association, Lucy Theis QC, pointed out that “expertise in family law is not gained overnight” and these cuts will “drive expertise away, which is not in the public interest”.
Family law barristers have joined with the NSPCC to call for an urgent Parliamentary inquiry into the state of the family justice system. A coalition, including the Bar Council and Family Law Bar Association, have written to the chair of the House of Commons Justice Select Committee, Alan Beith MP, calling for an inquiry into the impact of repeated cuts in the family justice system.
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
