*/
Family law barristers have joined with the NSPCC to call for an urgent Parliamentary inquiry into the state of the family justice system. A coalition, including the Bar Council and Family Law Bar Association, have written to the chair of the House of Commons Justice Select Committee, Alan Beith MP, calling for an inquiry into the impact of repeated cuts in the family justice system.
The letter refers to The Work of the Family Bar, research commissioned by the Family Law Bar Association, and describes the profession as “close to breaking point as it struggles to cope with increasingly complex caseloads, the pressure to protect the interests of vulnerable clients, disruptive patterns of work and repeated cuts in pay.”
The “week-in-a-life” study, carried out by Dr Debora Price and Anne Laybourne of the King’s Institute for the Study of Public Policy, analysed data from 1,610 barristers in 133 chambers and involved 5,012 pieces of work, 40% of which was undertaken under legal aid graduated fees.
The respondents were specialists: 75% spent 75% of their time on family law; half (the more senior) particularly specialised in ancillary relief or public law [children] work. Half worked more than 46 hours a week, and a quarter more than 56 hours per week, with median taxable profits of £66,000. Half earned less than £39,000 on legal aid work, in which hourly gross rates are £57.
Speaking at the launch of the research last month, Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “Barristers are not asking for more money.” The concern is the impact of the “abhorrent” cuts by the Legal Services Commission of £6.5m in counsel’s fees in children’s cases, which have just taken effect. Further cuts of up to £20–30m (more than a 50% cut in many complex cases) are likely to follow, as a result of the consultation Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010 (December 2008). The last time the LSC imposed substantial changes in family legal aid, in 2001, 28% of the family Bar stopped doing publicly funded ancillary relief hearings, the research showed. It is common now for those above 15 years’ call to refuse legally aided work.
Chair of the Family Law Bar Association, Lucy Theis QC, pointed out that “expertise in family law is not gained overnight” and these cuts will “drive expertise away, which is not in the public interest”.
The letter refers to The Work of the Family Bar, research commissioned by the Family Law Bar Association, and describes the profession as “close to breaking point as it struggles to cope with increasingly complex caseloads, the pressure to protect the interests of vulnerable clients, disruptive patterns of work and repeated cuts in pay.”
The “week-in-a-life” study, carried out by Dr Debora Price and Anne Laybourne of the King’s Institute for the Study of Public Policy, analysed data from 1,610 barristers in 133 chambers and involved 5,012 pieces of work, 40% of which was undertaken under legal aid graduated fees.
The respondents were specialists: 75% spent 75% of their time on family law; half (the more senior) particularly specialised in ancillary relief or public law [children] work. Half worked more than 46 hours a week, and a quarter more than 56 hours per week, with median taxable profits of £66,000. Half earned less than £39,000 on legal aid work, in which hourly gross rates are £57.
Speaking at the launch of the research last month, Desmond Browne QC, Chairman of the Bar, said: “Barristers are not asking for more money.” The concern is the impact of the “abhorrent” cuts by the Legal Services Commission of £6.5m in counsel’s fees in children’s cases, which have just taken effect. Further cuts of up to £20–30m (more than a 50% cut in many complex cases) are likely to follow, as a result of the consultation Family Legal Aid Funding from 2010 (December 2008). The last time the LSC imposed substantial changes in family legal aid, in 2001, 28% of the family Bar stopped doing publicly funded ancillary relief hearings, the research showed. It is common now for those above 15 years’ call to refuse legally aided work.
Chair of the Family Law Bar Association, Lucy Theis QC, pointed out that “expertise in family law is not gained overnight” and these cuts will “drive expertise away, which is not in the public interest”.
Family law barristers have joined with the NSPCC to call for an urgent Parliamentary inquiry into the state of the family justice system. A coalition, including the Bar Council and Family Law Bar Association, have written to the chair of the House of Commons Justice Select Committee, Alan Beith MP, calling for an inquiry into the impact of repeated cuts in the family justice system.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
Patrick Green KC talks about the landmark Post Office Group litigation and his driving principles for life and practice. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
Desiree Artesi meets Malcolm Bishop KC, the Lord Chief Justice of Tonga, who talks about his new role in the South Pacific and reflects on his career
