*/
Convicted defendants will have to pay fees of up to £1,200 towards the cost of their case, under provisions of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, which came into force on 13 April.
The new charges start at £150 for those who plead guilty to a summary offence in the magistrates’ court, rising to £500 following conviction in the magistrates’ court, and £1,200 for those convicted following a Crown court trial
Lord Chancellor, Chris Grayling MP, said the charge will ensure criminals “pay their way”, but critics have warned that the fees, which were introduced without consultation, risk encouraging the innocent to plead guilty and add to the mountain of uncollected debt owed to the court service.
Bar Chairman, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: “In times of austerity, it is difficult to argue against the proposition that convicted offenders should make a contribution towards the cost of their trial.” But, he said charging fees of £1,200 is “completely unrealistic”.
He said the Bar Council is reviewing its policy on criminal court fees and will be making representations to government about it.
The Act contained a range of law changes, the creation of new offences and increased prison terms for terrorism offences and internet trolling.
New offences included revenge porn, punishable with a sentence of up to two years in jail, and four crimes of juror misconduct.
It also introduced controversial changes limiting access to judicial review, which the Government claims will speed up the process and cut the number of meritless claims “clogging” the courts.
The new charges start at £150 for those who plead guilty to a summary offence in the magistrates’ court, rising to £500 following conviction in the magistrates’ court, and £1,200 for those convicted following a Crown court trial
Lord Chancellor, Chris Grayling MP, said the charge will ensure criminals “pay their way”, but critics have warned that the fees, which were introduced without consultation, risk encouraging the innocent to plead guilty and add to the mountain of uncollected debt owed to the court service.
Bar Chairman, Alistair MacDonald QC, said: “In times of austerity, it is difficult to argue against the proposition that convicted offenders should make a contribution towards the cost of their trial.” But, he said charging fees of £1,200 is “completely unrealistic”.
He said the Bar Council is reviewing its policy on criminal court fees and will be making representations to government about it.
The Act contained a range of law changes, the creation of new offences and increased prison terms for terrorism offences and internet trolling.
New offences included revenge porn, punishable with a sentence of up to two years in jail, and four crimes of juror misconduct.
It also introduced controversial changes limiting access to judicial review, which the Government claims will speed up the process and cut the number of meritless claims “clogging” the courts.
Convicted defendants will have to pay fees of up to £1,200 towards the cost of their case, under provisions of the Criminal Justice and Courts Act 2015, which came into force on 13 April.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
