*/
The government has “gone back on its word and resumed its attack on the criminal Bar” the new Criminal Bar Association (“CBA”) Chairman Paul Mendelle QC has warned.
In a letter to The Times , Mendelle, of 25 Bedford Row, accused the government of “spinning the facts” in its proposals to reduce fees for criminal defence work. The proposals were presented “as correcting an anomaly in order to bring defence fees into line with prosecution fees. They are nothing of the sort and the spin disguises a naked attempt by the government to go back on its word.
The government may be hoping the general public will have forgotten the facts, but the Bar certainly has not,” he wrote. “A government, apparently dissatisfied with its own independent review, has gone back on its word and resumed its attack on the criminal Bar by proposing to cut defence fees. Its actions will prevent many talented young people, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds or ethnic minorities, from becoming or remaining criminal barristers, with ultimate damage to the diversity of the judiciary.” He warned that although the government might suppose it was “simply inflicting pain on the few at the Bar” it was the criminal justice that would “suffer in the long run”.
The government may be hoping the general public will have forgotten the facts, but the Bar certainly has not,” he wrote. “A government, apparently dissatisfied with its own independent review, has gone back on its word and resumed its attack on the criminal Bar by proposing to cut defence fees. Its actions will prevent many talented young people, especially those from disadvantaged backgrounds or ethnic minorities, from becoming or remaining criminal barristers, with ultimate damage to the diversity of the judiciary.” He warned that although the government might suppose it was “simply inflicting pain on the few at the Bar” it was the criminal justice that would “suffer in the long run”.
The government has “gone back on its word and resumed its attack on the criminal Bar” the new Criminal Bar Association (“CBA”) Chairman Paul Mendelle QC has warned.
In a letter to The Times, Mendelle, of 25 Bedford Row, accused the government of “spinning the facts” in its proposals to reduce fees for criminal defence work. The proposals were presented “as correcting an anomaly in order to bring defence fees into line with prosecution fees. They are nothing of the sort and the spin disguises a naked attempt by the government to go back on its word.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
