*/
Almost half of all judges would retire early due to poor pay and pension cuts and concerns over their safety, a survey revealed.
The second Judicial Attitudes Survey, carried out over the summer, showed that 42% of judges would leave if it was a ‘viable option’, almost double the 23% from the previous survey in 2014.
More than a third (36%) of salaried judges said they may consider leaving the judiciary early over the next five years. But the highest proportions who say they would leave early were at the High Court (47%), Court of Appeal (41%) and Circuit judges (40%).
A majority of judges (76%) felt their working conditions had deteriorated since 2014. An overwhelming majority (78%) of salaried judges said they had a loss of net earnings over the last two years and 62% said the change in pensions has affected them personally. Overall, 74% felt their pay and pension entitlement did not adequately reflect their work.
More than half (51%) had concerns for their personal safety while in court, while 37% were concerned for their safety outside court and 15% had concerns related to social media.
Virtually all judges felt they provide an important service to society (97%) and had a strong personal attachment to being a member of the judiciary (90%), but they did not feel their work was valued. Less than half (43%) felt valued by the public, 3% by the media and 2% by the government.
Factors that would make them stay on the bench were higher pay (80%), a settled position on pensions (57%) and better administrative support (56%).
The Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas and the Senior President of Tribunals Sir Ernest Ryder said: ‘The quality of the judiciary underpins the rule of law and the continued success of our legal services market nationally and internationally.
‘We are therefore extremely grateful to those who took part in the survey, which assists the [Senior Salaries Review Body] in making evidence-based recommendations to government on judicial pay. ‘In the light of the substantially greater remuneration available to the most able practitioners in private practice, these matters are vital to our ability to attract candidates and retain judges of the highest calibre.’
In January an employment tribunal ruled that more than 200 judges, whose pension entitlements had been cut significantly, were discriminated against by the Ministry of Justice on the grounds of their age, sex and race.
Almost half of all judges would retire early due to poor pay and pension cuts and concerns over their safety, a survey revealed.
The second Judicial Attitudes Survey, carried out over the summer, showed that 42% of judges would leave if it was a ‘viable option’, almost double the 23% from the previous survey in 2014.
More than a third (36%) of salaried judges said they may consider leaving the judiciary early over the next five years. But the highest proportions who say they would leave early were at the High Court (47%), Court of Appeal (41%) and Circuit judges (40%).
A majority of judges (76%) felt their working conditions had deteriorated since 2014. An overwhelming majority (78%) of salaried judges said they had a loss of net earnings over the last two years and 62% said the change in pensions has affected them personally. Overall, 74% felt their pay and pension entitlement did not adequately reflect their work.
More than half (51%) had concerns for their personal safety while in court, while 37% were concerned for their safety outside court and 15% had concerns related to social media.
Virtually all judges felt they provide an important service to society (97%) and had a strong personal attachment to being a member of the judiciary (90%), but they did not feel their work was valued. Less than half (43%) felt valued by the public, 3% by the media and 2% by the government.
Factors that would make them stay on the bench were higher pay (80%), a settled position on pensions (57%) and better administrative support (56%).
The Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas and the Senior President of Tribunals Sir Ernest Ryder said: ‘The quality of the judiciary underpins the rule of law and the continued success of our legal services market nationally and internationally.
‘We are therefore extremely grateful to those who took part in the survey, which assists the [Senior Salaries Review Body] in making evidence-based recommendations to government on judicial pay. ‘In the light of the substantially greater remuneration available to the most able practitioners in private practice, these matters are vital to our ability to attract candidates and retain judges of the highest calibre.’
In January an employment tribunal ruled that more than 200 judges, whose pension entitlements had been cut significantly, were discriminated against by the Ministry of Justice on the grounds of their age, sex and race.
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
