*/
Almost half of all judges would retire early due to poor pay and pension cuts and concerns over their safety, a survey revealed.
The second Judicial Attitudes Survey, carried out over the summer, showed that 42% of judges would leave if it was a ‘viable option’, almost double the 23% from the previous survey in 2014.
More than a third (36%) of salaried judges said they may consider leaving the judiciary early over the next five years. But the highest proportions who say they would leave early were at the High Court (47%), Court of Appeal (41%) and Circuit judges (40%).
A majority of judges (76%) felt their working conditions had deteriorated since 2014. An overwhelming majority (78%) of salaried judges said they had a loss of net earnings over the last two years and 62% said the change in pensions has affected them personally. Overall, 74% felt their pay and pension entitlement did not adequately reflect their work.
More than half (51%) had concerns for their personal safety while in court, while 37% were concerned for their safety outside court and 15% had concerns related to social media.
Virtually all judges felt they provide an important service to society (97%) and had a strong personal attachment to being a member of the judiciary (90%), but they did not feel their work was valued. Less than half (43%) felt valued by the public, 3% by the media and 2% by the government.
Factors that would make them stay on the bench were higher pay (80%), a settled position on pensions (57%) and better administrative support (56%).
The Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas and the Senior President of Tribunals Sir Ernest Ryder said: ‘The quality of the judiciary underpins the rule of law and the continued success of our legal services market nationally and internationally.
‘We are therefore extremely grateful to those who took part in the survey, which assists the [Senior Salaries Review Body] in making evidence-based recommendations to government on judicial pay. ‘In the light of the substantially greater remuneration available to the most able practitioners in private practice, these matters are vital to our ability to attract candidates and retain judges of the highest calibre.’
In January an employment tribunal ruled that more than 200 judges, whose pension entitlements had been cut significantly, were discriminated against by the Ministry of Justice on the grounds of their age, sex and race.
Almost half of all judges would retire early due to poor pay and pension cuts and concerns over their safety, a survey revealed.
The second Judicial Attitudes Survey, carried out over the summer, showed that 42% of judges would leave if it was a ‘viable option’, almost double the 23% from the previous survey in 2014.
More than a third (36%) of salaried judges said they may consider leaving the judiciary early over the next five years. But the highest proportions who say they would leave early were at the High Court (47%), Court of Appeal (41%) and Circuit judges (40%).
A majority of judges (76%) felt their working conditions had deteriorated since 2014. An overwhelming majority (78%) of salaried judges said they had a loss of net earnings over the last two years and 62% said the change in pensions has affected them personally. Overall, 74% felt their pay and pension entitlement did not adequately reflect their work.
More than half (51%) had concerns for their personal safety while in court, while 37% were concerned for their safety outside court and 15% had concerns related to social media.
Virtually all judges felt they provide an important service to society (97%) and had a strong personal attachment to being a member of the judiciary (90%), but they did not feel their work was valued. Less than half (43%) felt valued by the public, 3% by the media and 2% by the government.
Factors that would make them stay on the bench were higher pay (80%), a settled position on pensions (57%) and better administrative support (56%).
The Lord Chief Justice Lord Thomas and the Senior President of Tribunals Sir Ernest Ryder said: ‘The quality of the judiciary underpins the rule of law and the continued success of our legal services market nationally and internationally.
‘We are therefore extremely grateful to those who took part in the survey, which assists the [Senior Salaries Review Body] in making evidence-based recommendations to government on judicial pay. ‘In the light of the substantially greater remuneration available to the most able practitioners in private practice, these matters are vital to our ability to attract candidates and retain judges of the highest calibre.’
In January an employment tribunal ruled that more than 200 judges, whose pension entitlements had been cut significantly, were discriminated against by the Ministry of Justice on the grounds of their age, sex and race.
Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights some of the key achievements at the Bar Council this year
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management highlights some of the ways you can cut your IHT bill
Rachel Davenport breaks down everything you need to know about AlphaBiolabs’ industry-leading laboratory testing services for legal matters
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
Mark Neale, Director General of the Bar Standards Board, offers an update on the Equality Rules consultation
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Imposing a professional obligation to act in a way that advances equality, diversity and inclusion is the wrong way to achieve this ambition, says Nick Vineall KC
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
