*/
The 2005 and 2013 legal reporting reforms have given rise to initiatives and new images which feed into a new Arts and Humanities Research Council funded project: Judging Images: the making, management and consumption of judicial images. Leslie J Moran reflects upon this project and on Isobel Williams’s work.
Isobel Williams is not so much a courtroom artist, commissioned to produce court pictures for an image hungry media, but an artist interpreting her courtroom experiences in words and pictures. Her licence to draw in the Supreme Court is indicative of a new relationship between courts and visual media.
From birth the Supreme Court was, by s.47 of the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005, unshackled from the provisions of s.41 Criminal Justice Act 1925 prohibiting the making of visual representations in a courtroom and their publication. Since October 2013 new rules allow proceedings in the Court of Appeal to be recorded and broadcast.
Isobel’s drawings expose the lie that the camera’s eye has a monopoly when it comes to producing honest, penetrating and revealing representations. In contrast to the problematic assumptions that tie the image making capacity of camera technology to objectivity and truth, Isobel’s drawings make a virtue of her presence and perspective. It is apparent in her sometimes sparse and sometimes frenzied economy of lines and use of blocks of colour.
Her drawings capture an enduring obscurity in this age of transparency. A black wall of advocates’ broad backs topped off with the baroque lines of their wigs often obscures the judges who appear as little more than remote partly obscured knot-like caricatures. There is also a curious haunting and haunted portrayal of transparency, achieved by depicting the advocates as empty outlines or as diaphanous presences. Through these figures the judges and judicial assistants dotting the horizon stand out, their caricatured faces accentuated by Technicolor halos.
Five minutes watching Sky’s live-stream of court proceedings or judges reading summary judgments on YouTube proves that judicial activity is ‘visually challenging’. The drama is verbal, written, and cerebral. Someone head down reading out loud from a rustling set of papers makes for a dull static image. In contrast Isobel’s drawings have great vitality. They are rich in visual metaphors and storytelling capacity.
Her work is a new addition to a previously sparsely populated public gallery of courtroom and judicial images. It also offers a welcome counterpoint to the preoccupation with cameras and video images that fuels the dash to televise court proceedings.
The initiatives and new images flowing from the 2005 and 2013 reforms feed into a new project funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council: Judging Images: the making, management and consumption of judicial images. With Professor Linda Mulcahy of the London School of Economics our objective is to bring together practitioners and researchers to explore the past, present and future of judicial image making.
Studying the judicial image provides new opportunities to examine current and emerging concepts of justice and generate new insights into under researched and neglected dimensions of debates about the legitimacy of law and confidence in the institutions of justice.
The Judging Images project is built around a website and four events; three workshops and a public lecture. For further information email: l.moran@bbk.ac.uk.
Leslie J Moran, Professor, School of Law Birkbeck College
From birth the Supreme Court was, by s.47 of the Constitutional Reform Act of 2005, unshackled from the provisions of s.41 Criminal Justice Act 1925 prohibiting the making of visual representations in a courtroom and their publication. Since October 2013 new rules allow proceedings in the Court of Appeal to be recorded and broadcast.
Isobel’s drawings expose the lie that the camera’s eye has a monopoly when it comes to producing honest, penetrating and revealing representations. In contrast to the problematic assumptions that tie the image making capacity of camera technology to objectivity and truth, Isobel’s drawings make a virtue of her presence and perspective. It is apparent in her sometimes sparse and sometimes frenzied economy of lines and use of blocks of colour.
Her drawings capture an enduring obscurity in this age of transparency. A black wall of advocates’ broad backs topped off with the baroque lines of their wigs often obscures the judges who appear as little more than remote partly obscured knot-like caricatures. There is also a curious haunting and haunted portrayal of transparency, achieved by depicting the advocates as empty outlines or as diaphanous presences. Through these figures the judges and judicial assistants dotting the horizon stand out, their caricatured faces accentuated by Technicolor halos.
Five minutes watching Sky’s live-stream of court proceedings or judges reading summary judgments on YouTube proves that judicial activity is ‘visually challenging’. The drama is verbal, written, and cerebral. Someone head down reading out loud from a rustling set of papers makes for a dull static image. In contrast Isobel’s drawings have great vitality. They are rich in visual metaphors and storytelling capacity.
Her work is a new addition to a previously sparsely populated public gallery of courtroom and judicial images. It also offers a welcome counterpoint to the preoccupation with cameras and video images that fuels the dash to televise court proceedings.
The initiatives and new images flowing from the 2005 and 2013 reforms feed into a new project funded by the Arts and Humanities Research Council: Judging Images: the making, management and consumption of judicial images. With Professor Linda Mulcahy of the London School of Economics our objective is to bring together practitioners and researchers to explore the past, present and future of judicial image making.
Studying the judicial image provides new opportunities to examine current and emerging concepts of justice and generate new insights into under researched and neglected dimensions of debates about the legitimacy of law and confidence in the institutions of justice.
The Judging Images project is built around a website and four events; three workshops and a public lecture. For further information email: l.moran@bbk.ac.uk.
Leslie J Moran, Professor, School of Law Birkbeck College
The 2005 and 2013 legal reporting reforms have given rise to initiatives and new images which feed into a new Arts and Humanities Research Council funded project: Judging Images: the making, management and consumption of judicial images. Leslie J Moran reflects upon this project and on Isobel Williams’s work.
Isobel Williams is not so much a courtroom artist, commissioned to produce court pictures for an image hungry media, but an artist interpreting her courtroom experiences in words and pictures. Her licence to draw in the Supreme Court is indicative of a new relationship between courts and visual media.
Efforts continue on gender equality, support for the Bar, meaningful reform for the sector and advocating for the rule of law
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Leading drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Beatson Cancer Charity in Glasgow as part of its Giving Back campaign
Girls Human Rights Festival 2025: a global gathering for change
Exclusive Q&A with Henry Dannell
Patrick Green KC talks about the landmark Post Office Group litigation and his driving principles for life and practice. Interview by Anthony Inglese CB
Desiree Artesi meets Malcolm Bishop KC, the Lord Chief Justice of Tonga, who talks about his new role in the South Pacific and reflects on his career
Sir Nicholas Mostyn, former High Court judge, on starting a hit podcast with fellow ‘Parkies’ after the shock of his diagnosis
Exclusive QA with Henry Dannell
Once you submit your silk application, what happens next? Sir Paul Morgan explains each stage of the process and reflects on his experience as a member of the KC Selection Panel
