*/
Scripted by Robert Bolt from his play of the same name and directed by Fred Zinnemann (not in this instance by David Lean), A Man for All Seasons depicts the final years of Sir Thomas More, Lord Chancellor of Britain and quintessential man of integrity and letters.
A lawyer of great conscience, as most will (or should) know, he refused to sign a letter asking Pope Clement VIII to annul the marriage of Catherine of Aragon to Henry VIII and recognise the King by way of an oath of supremacy as Head of the Church of England. The only member of the Privy Council to oppose Wolsey’s (played here by Orson Welles) attempts to obtain an annulment from the Pope, on Wolsey’s death and promotion to Lord Chancellor More continues to resist the King (Robert Shaw) and his threats, tantrums and promises of royal favour. Richard Rich (John Hurt) and Thomas Cromwell (Leo McKern) plot to bring More down.
More is played impeccably by one of the more intermittent of the great screen and stage actors England has produced, Paul Scofield. Many were reluctant to give him the part. How wrong they were; the film scored six Academy Awards including Best Picture, Best Director and Best Actor for Scofield.
Integrity is of the ages and the film’s lessons are profound for our time. A Lord Chancellor acting with principle and integrity, a steadfast man of the law and a gatekeeper of the system. The sense of conscientious objection, the drawing of lines and markers of principle when ‘enough is enough’ – ultimately, at the cost of his head after a corrupt trial.
It is vitally important within any corrosive establishment to preserve those who Just Say No. There are other examples, notable for their rarity. Erwin Rommel, when he ultimately supported the plot against Hitler, is analogous. Rommel suffered a more private execution; a pill in the back of a car.
In a sense, More subscribed to the Bingham Principle of being an independent executive officer. The system breaks down when those who are the gatekeepers no longer uphold the law. It is an increasingly important issue for lawyers in high office at the present time to maintain a modicum of integrity, principle and moderation within office.
Now, acting on principle should not be confused with self-immolation or martyrdom. To walk away and live to fight another day is most often the prudent course of action. Ideally, establish the point vigorously then disassociate before it is too late. If you can. Many, such as More or Rommel, become trapped in an ever-worsening establishment and often fail to fully appreciate the gravity of matters when decency and honour no longer apply. They become victims of principle. By being principled.
The crucial modern text in respect of principle and moderation is, in my view, by the greatest man of letters of the 20th century. It is Camus’ The Rebel (1951). The rebel only in that he or she believes in form, rationality, argumentation, secular or Christian humanism and that odd word ‘decency’. In a world of severe threats to the cause of human rights moderation is needed to protect the vulnerable, whoever they are and wherever they come from.
More wrote, of course, an anti-dystopian text Utopia (1516) which is now part of the moderation of the anti-transhumanist zeitgeist. The voice in the wilderness. Well, what is wrong with peace, love, understanding and a measure of social democracy and/or integrity? That is the lesson of A Man for All Seasons. And as we unite in mourning of another person of conscience, principle and reason, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, we are reminded to be more (not less) than your office – as she was.
David Langwallner is a graduate of the Harvard Law School and the London School of Economics. He is a barrister at 1MCB and was 2015 Irish Lawyer of the Year for his work as director of the Irish Innocence Project.
Scripted by Robert Bolt from his play of the same name and directed by Fred Zinnemann (not in this instance by David Lean), A Man for All Seasons depicts the final years of Sir Thomas More, Lord Chancellor of Britain and quintessential man of integrity and letters.
A lawyer of great conscience, as most will (or should) know, he refused to sign a letter asking Pope Clement VIII to annul the marriage of Catherine of Aragon to Henry VIII and recognise the King by way of an oath of supremacy as Head of the Church of England. The only member of the Privy Council to oppose Wolsey’s (played here by Orson Welles) attempts to obtain an annulment from the Pope, on Wolsey’s death and promotion to Lord Chancellor More continues to resist the King (Robert Shaw) and his threats, tantrums and promises of royal favour. Richard Rich (John Hurt) and Thomas Cromwell (Leo McKern) plot to bring More down.
More is played impeccably by one of the more intermittent of the great screen and stage actors England has produced, Paul Scofield. Many were reluctant to give him the part. How wrong they were; the film scored six Academy Awards including Best Picture, Best Director and Best Actor for Scofield.
Integrity is of the ages and the film’s lessons are profound for our time. A Lord Chancellor acting with principle and integrity, a steadfast man of the law and a gatekeeper of the system. The sense of conscientious objection, the drawing of lines and markers of principle when ‘enough is enough’ – ultimately, at the cost of his head after a corrupt trial.
It is vitally important within any corrosive establishment to preserve those who Just Say No. There are other examples, notable for their rarity. Erwin Rommel, when he ultimately supported the plot against Hitler, is analogous. Rommel suffered a more private execution; a pill in the back of a car.
In a sense, More subscribed to the Bingham Principle of being an independent executive officer. The system breaks down when those who are the gatekeepers no longer uphold the law. It is an increasingly important issue for lawyers in high office at the present time to maintain a modicum of integrity, principle and moderation within office.
Now, acting on principle should not be confused with self-immolation or martyrdom. To walk away and live to fight another day is most often the prudent course of action. Ideally, establish the point vigorously then disassociate before it is too late. If you can. Many, such as More or Rommel, become trapped in an ever-worsening establishment and often fail to fully appreciate the gravity of matters when decency and honour no longer apply. They become victims of principle. By being principled.
The crucial modern text in respect of principle and moderation is, in my view, by the greatest man of letters of the 20th century. It is Camus’ The Rebel (1951). The rebel only in that he or she believes in form, rationality, argumentation, secular or Christian humanism and that odd word ‘decency’. In a world of severe threats to the cause of human rights moderation is needed to protect the vulnerable, whoever they are and wherever they come from.
More wrote, of course, an anti-dystopian text Utopia (1516) which is now part of the moderation of the anti-transhumanist zeitgeist. The voice in the wilderness. Well, what is wrong with peace, love, understanding and a measure of social democracy and/or integrity? That is the lesson of A Man for All Seasons. And as we unite in mourning of another person of conscience, principle and reason, Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, we are reminded to be more (not less) than your office – as she was.
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
