*/
The Lord Chancellor has pledged “rapid progress” towards a “fairer, more intuitive” payment system in which the trial advocate would receive the overall legal aid fee – driving forward a key recommendation in Sir Brian Leveson’s Review of Efficiencies in Criminal Proceedings before Parliament rises.
Accepting all of the Review’s proposals in principle, Chris Grayling MP said on 11 March that he will implement “those which can be delivered quickly”.
“I whole-heartedly welcome Sir Brian’s sensible recommendation to change the way fees are paid so the trial advocate receives the fee, and comes to a fair arrangement with any other advocates who worked on the case,” the Lord Chancellor said.
“I will therefore make this change as soon as possible. I have always said that while tough decisions had to be made about how public money is spent in these straightened times, I also want to make common sense changes to the ‘system’ where I can too.”
A statutory instrument to effect the change will be laid before Parliament dissolves, the Ministry of Justice confirmed.
Meanwhile, the Police, Crown Prosecution Service, Legal Aid Agency (LAA), defence lawyers and judiciary are said to be devising strategies on how to realise Sir Brian’s overarching principle of “getting charging decisions right first time” and foster greater cross-agency working, early engagement, and strong case ownership.
The Lord Chancellor has agreed with Sir Brian’s recommendation that cases should be retained by magistrates’ courts where possible, and has written to the Sentencing Council to request formally an amendment to the Allocation Guideline so that cases are not sent to the Crown court unless “clearly necessary”.
He confirmed that Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) is testing the possibility of “brigading cases”, whereby cases would be listed together when chambers or firms have a number of cases listed in the same court on a particular day.
The National Offender Management Service and HMCTS are working with local judiciary to share best practice and adapt existing arrangements to maximise the use of Crown court time by ensuring prisoners arrive in court on time.
The Lord Chancellor also confirmed that the CJS Efficiency Programme was on course to complete by July 2016 and would provide the basis of the CJS Common Platform Programme to support Sir Brian’s vision of more efficient working.
“I whole-heartedly welcome Sir Brian’s sensible recommendation to change the way fees are paid so the trial advocate receives the fee, and comes to a fair arrangement with any other advocates who worked on the case,” the Lord Chancellor said.
“I will therefore make this change as soon as possible. I have always said that while tough decisions had to be made about how public money is spent in these straightened times, I also want to make common sense changes to the ‘system’ where I can too.”
A statutory instrument to effect the change will be laid before Parliament dissolves, the Ministry of Justice confirmed.
Meanwhile, the Police, Crown Prosecution Service, Legal Aid Agency (LAA), defence lawyers and judiciary are said to be devising strategies on how to realise Sir Brian’s overarching principle of “getting charging decisions right first time” and foster greater cross-agency working, early engagement, and strong case ownership.
The Lord Chancellor has agreed with Sir Brian’s recommendation that cases should be retained by magistrates’ courts where possible, and has written to the Sentencing Council to request formally an amendment to the Allocation Guideline so that cases are not sent to the Crown court unless “clearly necessary”.
He confirmed that Her Majesty’s Courts and Tribunals Service (HMCTS) is testing the possibility of “brigading cases”, whereby cases would be listed together when chambers or firms have a number of cases listed in the same court on a particular day.
The National Offender Management Service and HMCTS are working with local judiciary to share best practice and adapt existing arrangements to maximise the use of Crown court time by ensuring prisoners arrive in court on time.
The Lord Chancellor also confirmed that the CJS Efficiency Programme was on course to complete by July 2016 and would provide the basis of the CJS Common Platform Programme to support Sir Brian’s vision of more efficient working.
The Lord Chancellor has pledged “rapid progress” towards a “fairer, more intuitive” payment system in which the trial advocate would receive the overall legal aid fee – driving forward a key recommendation in Sir Brian Leveson’s Review of Efficiencies in Criminal Proceedings before Parliament rises.
Accepting all of the Review’s proposals in principle, Chris Grayling MP said on 11 March that he will implement “those which can be delivered quickly”.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
