*/
Plans to cut conditional fee agreements (“CFA”) success fees for libel cases by up to 90 per cent have been dropped owing to lack of Parliamentary time.
The controversial plans, which were opposed by many claimant libel lawyers, would have capped the success fee chargeable in CFAs from a maximum 100 per cent to ten per cent. The reforms had previously failed to pass the committee stage in the House of Commons after four labour MPs joined opposition parties to vote it down.
Claimant libel lawyers have criticised the reduction to a ten per cent success fee on the basis that solicitors would be unable to bear the risk of bringing many otherwise deserving cases. They say that in practice the lawyer never recovers the full costs involved.
They have also pointed out that the risk is staged, with the 100 per cent success fee only applying at trial and most cases settling at an early stage in proceedings. This has the benefit that lawyers need carefully to assess the risks involved at every stage.
The Law Society has called for substantial research and consultation before any further proposals are put before Parliament. Robert Heslett, President of the Law Society, said: “Attempting to rush legislation, delegated or otherwise, through Parliament fails to consider the impact it can have.”
All three of the main parties have pledged to reform the libel laws after the general election.
Claimant libel lawyers have criticised the reduction to a ten per cent success fee on the basis that solicitors would be unable to bear the risk of bringing many otherwise deserving cases. They say that in practice the lawyer never recovers the full costs involved.
They have also pointed out that the risk is staged, with the 100 per cent success fee only applying at trial and most cases settling at an early stage in proceedings. This has the benefit that lawyers need carefully to assess the risks involved at every stage.
The Law Society has called for substantial research and consultation before any further proposals are put before Parliament. Robert Heslett, President of the Law Society, said: “Attempting to rush legislation, delegated or otherwise, through Parliament fails to consider the impact it can have.”
All three of the main parties have pledged to reform the libel laws after the general election.
Plans to cut conditional fee agreements (“CFA”) success fees for libel cases by up to 90 per cent have been dropped owing to lack of Parliamentary time.
The controversial plans, which were opposed by many claimant libel lawyers, would have capped the success fee chargeable in CFAs from a maximum 100 per cent to ten per cent. The reforms had previously failed to pass the committee stage in the House of Commons after four labour MPs joined opposition parties to vote it down.
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
