*/
Joanna Chatterton and David Murphy consider two critical workplace issues – effective performance management and the new duty to proactively prevent sexual harassment
People management issues are often time consuming, can result in a fractious workplace and can have legal and reputational consequences for chambers. How do you then navigate the pitfalls and ensure best practice? This article aims to provide a helpful insight to tackling two different workplace issues. The first, the effective performance management of employees. The second, the new duty to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment under the Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act in force from 26 October 2024.
Let’s imagine a scenario: a clerk is underperforming and despite a ‘quiet word’ from the head of their clerking team, the situation has not improved and needs be addressed. This is a common problem that occurs in different forms in every workplace. Yet mismanagement of performance issues far too often results in an expensive and unsatisfactory outcome. The following practical steps are recommended:
Look at the circumstances closely and establish if it is appropriate to maintain an informal approach giving real-time feedback to allow the individual to improve. What has been communicated to the individual to date? Has the messaging been reasonable and clear? If so, has the individual understood it? If repeated informal messages are not achieving the required outcome, then proceed to a formal process. However, before doing so, consider any mitigating factors that may be relevant such as ill health/medical concerns, carer responsibilities or disabilities. Consider whether you need to make any reasonable adjustments before proceeding. If the individual’s health is of concern, ensure that you have an up to date understanding of the medical position. Consider using an occupational health adviser to provide a diagnosis and prognosis as may be required.
Ensure the process you follow is consistent with the principles of the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures.
Keep it simple. Avoid over-complicating the process with the involvement of additional steps, people and layers of legal analysis.
Appoint one ‘decision maker’ to review all of the information and decide the outcome and consider who might be appropriate to act as an appeal decision manager in the event an appeal is lodged in the future. A common mistake that chambers make in this context is making decisions by committee. Choosing several individuals to act jointly convolutes the process, increases the time required by all parties, and increases the number of people who may be criticised further down the line. There is no requirement to create a quasi court process.
Create a performance improvement plan (PIP) for the individual which:
Once the review date has been set, stick to it where possible. It can be tempting to delay difficult decisions or dilute the process. Adhere to review deadlines unless delay is absolutely unavoidable, for example in light of medical issues.
Evaluate progress and hold a meaningful and honest discussion about continuing shortfalls and improvements. In the event that the individual fails to improve as reasonably required by the relevant deadlines, the decision manager should decide the outcome, which may include a warning or dismissal. Avoid passing on the decision to other individuals or creating a protracted or unnecessarily complex process for decision-making.
Plan ahead before ‘fire fighting’ the next performance issue. Provide those who have responsibility for managing the staff in chambers with training on how to give effective feedback on a real time basis and avoid the temptation to put off uncomfortable conversations in the hope that performance will improve over time on its own. Ensure appraisals and reviews are adhered to within the relevant timetable and that honest and constructive performance feedback is given. If you do not have one, put in place a non-contractual principle-based policy, compliant with the ACAS Code as a guide to how under performance will be managed.
We turn to look at the new proactive duty placed on employers to take ‘reasonable steps’ to prevent sexual harassment in the course of employment from 26 October 2024 and what is required.
It is clear that adopting a ‘one size fits all approach’ or having a template pre-determined checklist will not satisfy the duty. Organisations must also refer to the eight-step employer guide from the Equality and Human Rights Commission and are unlikely to be able to comply with the duty unless they carry out a risk assessment. But in practical terms, what does this require for a set?
Start a dialogue with members, clerks and any other staff in your set. Garner opinions to ensure you have an educated understanding of the contexts in which the risk of sexual harassment may arise. Have there been any complaints or incidents of sexual harassment in chambers in the past and, if so, what lessons can be learnt from them? Where might incidents occur in the future? Consider whether you may receive a more accurate picture if you enable colleagues to share their views and concerns anonymously if they wish.
Consider the following areas of risk:
Create a written risk assessment noting:
Implement the proposed actions:
Joanna Chatterton is a partner at law firm Fox Williams LLP. She specialises in advising barristers chambers and professional services firms on employment and discrimination issues.
David Murphy is a partner at law firm Fox Williams LLP. He specialises in advising barristers chambers and professional services firms on employment and discrimination issues.
People management issues are often time consuming, can result in a fractious workplace and can have legal and reputational consequences for chambers. How do you then navigate the pitfalls and ensure best practice? This article aims to provide a helpful insight to tackling two different workplace issues. The first, the effective performance management of employees. The second, the new duty to take reasonable steps to prevent sexual harassment under the Worker Protection (Amendment of Equality Act 2010) Act in force from 26 October 2024.
Let’s imagine a scenario: a clerk is underperforming and despite a ‘quiet word’ from the head of their clerking team, the situation has not improved and needs be addressed. This is a common problem that occurs in different forms in every workplace. Yet mismanagement of performance issues far too often results in an expensive and unsatisfactory outcome. The following practical steps are recommended:
Look at the circumstances closely and establish if it is appropriate to maintain an informal approach giving real-time feedback to allow the individual to improve. What has been communicated to the individual to date? Has the messaging been reasonable and clear? If so, has the individual understood it? If repeated informal messages are not achieving the required outcome, then proceed to a formal process. However, before doing so, consider any mitigating factors that may be relevant such as ill health/medical concerns, carer responsibilities or disabilities. Consider whether you need to make any reasonable adjustments before proceeding. If the individual’s health is of concern, ensure that you have an up to date understanding of the medical position. Consider using an occupational health adviser to provide a diagnosis and prognosis as may be required.
Ensure the process you follow is consistent with the principles of the ACAS Code of Practice on disciplinary and grievance procedures.
Keep it simple. Avoid over-complicating the process with the involvement of additional steps, people and layers of legal analysis.
Appoint one ‘decision maker’ to review all of the information and decide the outcome and consider who might be appropriate to act as an appeal decision manager in the event an appeal is lodged in the future. A common mistake that chambers make in this context is making decisions by committee. Choosing several individuals to act jointly convolutes the process, increases the time required by all parties, and increases the number of people who may be criticised further down the line. There is no requirement to create a quasi court process.
Create a performance improvement plan (PIP) for the individual which:
Once the review date has been set, stick to it where possible. It can be tempting to delay difficult decisions or dilute the process. Adhere to review deadlines unless delay is absolutely unavoidable, for example in light of medical issues.
Evaluate progress and hold a meaningful and honest discussion about continuing shortfalls and improvements. In the event that the individual fails to improve as reasonably required by the relevant deadlines, the decision manager should decide the outcome, which may include a warning or dismissal. Avoid passing on the decision to other individuals or creating a protracted or unnecessarily complex process for decision-making.
Plan ahead before ‘fire fighting’ the next performance issue. Provide those who have responsibility for managing the staff in chambers with training on how to give effective feedback on a real time basis and avoid the temptation to put off uncomfortable conversations in the hope that performance will improve over time on its own. Ensure appraisals and reviews are adhered to within the relevant timetable and that honest and constructive performance feedback is given. If you do not have one, put in place a non-contractual principle-based policy, compliant with the ACAS Code as a guide to how under performance will be managed.
We turn to look at the new proactive duty placed on employers to take ‘reasonable steps’ to prevent sexual harassment in the course of employment from 26 October 2024 and what is required.
It is clear that adopting a ‘one size fits all approach’ or having a template pre-determined checklist will not satisfy the duty. Organisations must also refer to the eight-step employer guide from the Equality and Human Rights Commission and are unlikely to be able to comply with the duty unless they carry out a risk assessment. But in practical terms, what does this require for a set?
Start a dialogue with members, clerks and any other staff in your set. Garner opinions to ensure you have an educated understanding of the contexts in which the risk of sexual harassment may arise. Have there been any complaints or incidents of sexual harassment in chambers in the past and, if so, what lessons can be learnt from them? Where might incidents occur in the future? Consider whether you may receive a more accurate picture if you enable colleagues to share their views and concerns anonymously if they wish.
Consider the following areas of risk:
Create a written risk assessment noting:
Implement the proposed actions:
Joanna Chatterton and David Murphy consider two critical workplace issues – effective performance management and the new duty to proactively prevent sexual harassment
Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights some of the key achievements at the Bar Council this year
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management highlights some of the ways you can cut your IHT bill
Rachel Davenport breaks down everything you need to know about AlphaBiolabs’ industry-leading laboratory testing services for legal matters
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
