*/
The Ministry of Justice is to carry out a wide-ranging review of the family justice system in England and Wales.
The review—part of the cross-government “Families and Relationship Green Paper” launched in January—will look at ways to avoid confrontational court hearings and encourage the use of mediation.
Between five and ten per cent of separating parents resolve child access disputes through the courts. They are often unaware that mediation is available or wrongly assume it is only for couples wishing to reconcile.
The paper proposes making it compulsory for privately-funded clients to consider mediation before having residence and contact disputes heard in court. This is currently a requirement for legal aid clients. Extra support may be given to the Family Mediation Council to build on existing accreditation schemes for family mediators.
A review panel is to be appointed to hear from people with experience of the family justice system, and may issue calls for evidence, focus groups and formal consultation.
Between five and ten per cent of separating parents resolve child access disputes through the courts. They are often unaware that mediation is available or wrongly assume it is only for couples wishing to reconcile.
The paper proposes making it compulsory for privately-funded clients to consider mediation before having residence and contact disputes heard in court. This is currently a requirement for legal aid clients. Extra support may be given to the Family Mediation Council to build on existing accreditation schemes for family mediators.
A review panel is to be appointed to hear from people with experience of the family justice system, and may issue calls for evidence, focus groups and formal consultation.
The Ministry of Justice is to carry out a wide-ranging review of the family justice system in England and Wales.
The review—part of the cross-government “Families and Relationship Green Paper” launched in January—will look at ways to avoid confrontational court hearings and encourage the use of mediation.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
