*/
The Supreme Court ruled by a majority of four to one that an injunction banning publication in England and Wales of the name of the celebrity involved in an extra-marital threesome should remain in place, despite wide-spread naming of the parties in other countires and online. The court said that lifting it would breach the privacy rights of the celebrity and his children. Lord Toulson dissented.
The Supreme Court ruled by a majority of four to one that an injunction banning publication in England and Wales of the name of the celebrity involved in an extra-marital threesome should remain in place, despite wide-spread naming of the parties in other countires and online. The court said that lifting it would breach the privacy rights of the celebrity and his children. Lord Toulson dissented.
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
