*/
Barristers will be told that non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) must not be used to cover up offences that should be reported to the police or regulator.
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) is set to issue guidance for barristers on the use of NDAs in cases of alleged sexual harassment. A spokesperson told Counsel that the guidance will state that the use of NDAs is inappropriate if it seeks to prevent the reporting of matters that are disclosable to regulatory or law enforcement bodies or under the Public Interest Disclosure Act, and that they should not be used to ‘threaten, intimidate or deter’ someone from making a proper disclosure.
In updated guidance regarding the reporting of serious misconduct of others, the regulator made it clear that enforcement will not be taken against barristers who fail to report discrimination, harassment or victimisation where they have been the subject of the misconduct. The BSB is also piloting a scheme to grant a waiver from the duty to report for barristers trained to advise and support others.
Figures released in the regulator’s annual Enforcement Report showed that there were eight reports of sexual harassment by barristers in 2016-17, while there had been none in the previous year.
The report showed that the number of complaints against barristers had risen by nearly 30% over the past year to 475 – the highest number of new complaints opened in any year since 2013-14 – and reports of serious misconduct had risen to 133 from 110. However, the number of barristers disbarred fell to six from 20.
Barristers will be told that non-disclosure agreements (NDAs) must not be used to cover up offences that should be reported to the police or regulator.
The Bar Standards Board (BSB) is set to issue guidance for barristers on the use of NDAs in cases of alleged sexual harassment. A spokesperson told Counsel that the guidance will state that the use of NDAs is inappropriate if it seeks to prevent the reporting of matters that are disclosable to regulatory or law enforcement bodies or under the Public Interest Disclosure Act, and that they should not be used to ‘threaten, intimidate or deter’ someone from making a proper disclosure.
In updated guidance regarding the reporting of serious misconduct of others, the regulator made it clear that enforcement will not be taken against barristers who fail to report discrimination, harassment or victimisation where they have been the subject of the misconduct. The BSB is also piloting a scheme to grant a waiver from the duty to report for barristers trained to advise and support others.
Figures released in the regulator’s annual Enforcement Report showed that there were eight reports of sexual harassment by barristers in 2016-17, while there had been none in the previous year.
The report showed that the number of complaints against barristers had risen by nearly 30% over the past year to 475 – the highest number of new complaints opened in any year since 2013-14 – and reports of serious misconduct had risen to 133 from 110. However, the number of barristers disbarred fell to six from 20.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
