*/
The former Lord Chancellor called for restrictions on the rights of audience of solicitor-advocates in order to ‘restore the criminal Bar to health’.
Delivering the Longford Lecture in November 2016, Michael Gove MP said serious criminal defence work should be restricted to barristers, and solicitor-advocates who re-qualify.
While there were ‘some very fine solicitor-advocates’, he suggested that barristers provide a ‘better service’.
He bemoaned the decline of the criminal Bar, ‘squeezed to the margins’ due to economic forces that have driven solicitors’ firms to retain work in-house.
He said: ‘I think we should investigate how we can better regulate those solicitor firms who refer clients to in-house advocates or those with whom they have any sort of other commercial relationship.’
Solicitors reacted to his comments with fury. Will Richmond-Coggan, Chairman of the Solicitors’ Association of Higher Court Advocates, accused the Bar of using ‘protectionist tactics’ to ‘crowd out the newcomers with unsubstantiated whispering campaigns and appeals to their powerful friends in government’.
Barristers, he said, ‘want to impose artificial barriers to entry for any who seek to threaten their historic monopoly’.
But Francis Fitzgibbon QC, Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association, said: ‘I welcome any advocate whose ability matches the cases they are briefed in. The label matters less than the content of the bottle.’
The former Lord Chancellor called for restrictions on the rights of audience of solicitor-advocates in order to ‘restore the criminal Bar to health’.
Delivering the Longford Lecture in November 2016, Michael Gove MP said serious criminal defence work should be restricted to barristers, and solicitor-advocates who re-qualify.
While there were ‘some very fine solicitor-advocates’, he suggested that barristers provide a ‘better service’.
He bemoaned the decline of the criminal Bar, ‘squeezed to the margins’ due to economic forces that have driven solicitors’ firms to retain work in-house.
He said: ‘I think we should investigate how we can better regulate those solicitor firms who refer clients to in-house advocates or those with whom they have any sort of other commercial relationship.’
Solicitors reacted to his comments with fury. Will Richmond-Coggan, Chairman of the Solicitors’ Association of Higher Court Advocates, accused the Bar of using ‘protectionist tactics’ to ‘crowd out the newcomers with unsubstantiated whispering campaigns and appeals to their powerful friends in government’.
Barristers, he said, ‘want to impose artificial barriers to entry for any who seek to threaten their historic monopoly’.
But Francis Fitzgibbon QC, Chairman of the Criminal Bar Association, said: ‘I welcome any advocate whose ability matches the cases they are briefed in. The label matters less than the content of the bottle.’
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
