*/
Efforts to broaden the profile of the Bench appear to be working, with more women and black and ethnic minority (“BME”) lawyers applying for judicial office.
New research, produced by the Judicial Appointments Commission (“JAC”) and the MoJ, compares current selections with those made prior to the establishment of the JAC, and includes analysis of the number of women and BME candidates over the last ten years.
Since the JAC was set up in 2006, more women and BME lawyers than before have applied for judicial roles and more women have been appointed. The number of successful BME candidates has remained constant.
Karl King, a member of the Bar Council’s Equality and Diversity Committee, said: “It is important that there is a widening of the take up across the range of judicial posts therefore we are pleased to see some increase in the number of candidates applying. Although the numbers in relation to BME appointments are static there must be some encouragement that in the future this will improve.”
Baroness Prashar, Chair of the JAC, said: “This analysis is a major breakthrough. For the first time we have the facts that show progress has been made and dispels the myth that progress of judicial diversity has been stemmed. More importantly it provides a clear and agreed benchmark to measure future trends.”
The JAC has also published the results of the latest round of applications for District Judge (Civil) posts. The number of applications has doubled on the previous round in 2007–08, with 505 candidates for 81 vacancies.
Applications from BME candidates have more than trebled, the number of applications from solicitors doubled, and both BME and solicitor candidates increased their share of the final tally.
Solicitors and barristers notched up similar success rates this time—in the last round 13 per cent more barristers were selected.
New research, produced by the Judicial Appointments Commission (“JAC”) and the MoJ, compares current selections with those made prior to the establishment of the JAC, and includes analysis of the number of women and BME candidates over the last ten years.
Since the JAC was set up in 2006, more women and BME lawyers than before have applied for judicial roles and more women have been appointed. The number of successful BME candidates has remained constant.
Karl King, a member of the Bar Council’s Equality and Diversity Committee, said: “It is important that there is a widening of the take up across the range of judicial posts therefore we are pleased to see some increase in the number of candidates applying. Although the numbers in relation to BME appointments are static there must be some encouragement that in the future this will improve.”
Baroness Prashar, Chair of the JAC, said: “This analysis is a major breakthrough. For the first time we have the facts that show progress has been made and dispels the myth that progress of judicial diversity has been stemmed. More importantly it provides a clear and agreed benchmark to measure future trends.”
The JAC has also published the results of the latest round of applications for District Judge (Civil) posts. The number of applications has doubled on the previous round in 2007–08, with 505 candidates for 81 vacancies.
Applications from BME candidates have more than trebled, the number of applications from solicitors doubled, and both BME and solicitor candidates increased their share of the final tally.
Solicitors and barristers notched up similar success rates this time—in the last round 13 per cent more barristers were selected.
Efforts to broaden the profile of the Bench appear to be working, with more women and black and ethnic minority (“BME”) lawyers applying for judicial office.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
