*/
Baroness Scotland has mounted a robust defence of the “fundamentally sound” role of the Attorney General. The government began a review of the role of Attorney General in 2007 and announced its decision, that no change to the law was necessary, in 2009.
In a speech to the Administrative Law Bar Association on “The role of the Attorney General in the 21st Century”, Baroness Scotland said: “After the analysis, the talk of tensions and contradictions, I say simply this: for all the problems, which I acknowledge, no suggestion that an Attorney General in modern times has in fact taken a decision on the basis of political or otherwise improper considerations has been substantiated ... Let us not apply nice theoretical tests to the role of Attorney General and watch the role fail them; let us see whether the role works in practice. And if it does not need fixing, why break it?”
On controversy surrounding advice given on Iraq, BAE and cash for honours, she said: “It is the issues that are difficult and controversial; and that will be the case whoever has to take them.”
However, some reforms have been implemented which have not required a change in the law. These include a Protocol setting out that the Attorney General no longer has the power to give a direction in an individual case save in “exceptional circumstances” and where necessary to safeguard national security.
Baroness Scotland said she would lay an annual report of her duties before Parliament.
In a speech to the Administrative Law Bar Association on “The role of the Attorney General in the 21st Century”, Baroness Scotland said: “After the analysis, the talk of tensions and contradictions, I say simply this: for all the problems, which I acknowledge, no suggestion that an Attorney General in modern times has in fact taken a decision on the basis of political or otherwise improper considerations has been substantiated ... Let us not apply nice theoretical tests to the role of Attorney General and watch the role fail them; let us see whether the role works in practice. And if it does not need fixing, why break it?”
On controversy surrounding advice given on Iraq, BAE and cash for honours, she said: “It is the issues that are difficult and controversial; and that will be the case whoever has to take them.”
However, some reforms have been implemented which have not required a change in the law. These include a Protocol setting out that the Attorney General no longer has the power to give a direction in an individual case save in “exceptional circumstances” and where necessary to safeguard national security.
Baroness Scotland said she would lay an annual report of her duties before Parliament.
Baroness Scotland has mounted a robust defence of the “fundamentally sound” role of the Attorney General. The government began a review of the role of Attorney General in 2007 and announced its decision, that no change to the law was necessary, in 2009.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Oscar Davies shares their lessons learnt
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
