*/
Britain is still “deeply elitist”, according to a study of the background of 4,000 law, media and political leaders in UK public life.
Elitist Britain?, published by the Commission on Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission in August, highlighted a “dramatic over-representation” of those educated at independent schools and Oxbridge, “so stark that it could be called social engineering”.
The judiciary topped the elite list: 71% of senior judges attended independent schools (compared to 7% of the public as a whole) – and 75% attended Oxford or Cambridge (compared to 1% of the public). Only 4% of 150 senior judges went to comprehensive school – the lowest figure for all groups. Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court, told UKSC Blog in September that although representation will improve over time, “it will be too slow unless we do something to make it happen”.
He supported the idea of a “career judiciary” with a potential fast-track for people with dependents who needed more regular hours and where reasonable holidays can more easily be taken: an option also favoured by former Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge.
“An individual could enter it at, say, the age of thirty-five as a junior tribunal member or possibly a district judge and work their way up [but] it’s a very difficult exercise because it’s important to make sure others coming from a more traditional career aren’t then overlooked,” Lord Neuberger said. Meanwhile, the Bar Council’s social mobility strategy is focused on tackling the three largest barriers to fair access to the profession – cash, contact and confidence. Writing in Counsel, Social Mobility Committee Chair Taryn Lee QC said the Bar has “a long history of professionalism, tradition and custom, so naturally a particular culture will have arisen” but “if you believe, as we do, that we need to create a Bar of all and for all, then we all have a responsibility to ensure that background is no barrier” (August p 10).
The judiciary topped the elite list: 71% of senior judges attended independent schools (compared to 7% of the public as a whole) – and 75% attended Oxford or Cambridge (compared to 1% of the public). Only 4% of 150 senior judges went to comprehensive school – the lowest figure for all groups. Lord Neuberger, President of the Supreme Court, told UKSC Blog in September that although representation will improve over time, “it will be too slow unless we do something to make it happen”.
He supported the idea of a “career judiciary” with a potential fast-track for people with dependents who needed more regular hours and where reasonable holidays can more easily be taken: an option also favoured by former Lord Chief Justice Lord Judge.
“An individual could enter it at, say, the age of thirty-five as a junior tribunal member or possibly a district judge and work their way up [but] it’s a very difficult exercise because it’s important to make sure others coming from a more traditional career aren’t then overlooked,” Lord Neuberger said. Meanwhile, the Bar Council’s social mobility strategy is focused on tackling the three largest barriers to fair access to the profession – cash, contact and confidence. Writing in Counsel, Social Mobility Committee Chair Taryn Lee QC said the Bar has “a long history of professionalism, tradition and custom, so naturally a particular culture will have arisen” but “if you believe, as we do, that we need to create a Bar of all and for all, then we all have a responsibility to ensure that background is no barrier” (August p 10).
Britain is still “deeply elitist”, according to a study of the background of 4,000 law, media and political leaders in UK public life.
Elitist Britain?, published by the Commission on Social Mobility and Child Poverty Commission in August, highlighted a “dramatic over-representation” of those educated at independent schools and Oxbridge, “so stark that it could be called social engineering”.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier