*/
Some solicitors are overcharging clients for the work done by barristers, the Bar Council has claimed.
In a practice note, Retainers, Fee Arrangements and Non-Standard Work Arrangements, revised in February, the Bar Council said it is aware that in some situations, solicitors are charging clients more for the services provided by barristers than the barristers themselves are charging.
The Bar Council’s Ethics and Remuneration Committee explained that the practice may be permissible in some situations, for instance where the arrangement is one in which the barristers’ fees are genuinely a cost to the solicitors themselves, or where it is done with the informed agreement of a ‘sophisticated commercial client’.
But it warned that it is ‘quite wrong’ where the barristers’ fees ought to be charged as a disbursement, and said it could raise serious questions about the solicitors’ professional conduct.
The committee said: ‘In most circumstances, this will not be an issue for you. You will not usually be aware of communications between your solicitors and their client about fees.’
It added: ‘Your solicitors’ charges to their client are also primarily a matter between your solicitors and that client, and whether your solicitors’ actions are permissible is a matter of law and conduct for your solicitors as independent professionals.’
However, the note told barristers to ensure that they are not ‘actively and knowingly’ involved in any arrangement where the client is charged more for their services than they are charging in circumstances in which it is unlawful or in breach of the solicitor’s duties to the client.
Some solicitors are overcharging clients for the work done by barristers, the Bar Council has claimed.
In a practice note, Retainers, Fee Arrangements and Non-Standard Work Arrangements, revised in February, the Bar Council said it is aware that in some situations, solicitors are charging clients more for the services provided by barristers than the barristers themselves are charging.
The Bar Council’s Ethics and Remuneration Committee explained that the practice may be permissible in some situations, for instance where the arrangement is one in which the barristers’ fees are genuinely a cost to the solicitors themselves, or where it is done with the informed agreement of a ‘sophisticated commercial client’.
But it warned that it is ‘quite wrong’ where the barristers’ fees ought to be charged as a disbursement, and said it could raise serious questions about the solicitors’ professional conduct.
The committee said: ‘In most circumstances, this will not be an issue for you. You will not usually be aware of communications between your solicitors and their client about fees.’
It added: ‘Your solicitors’ charges to their client are also primarily a matter between your solicitors and that client, and whether your solicitors’ actions are permissible is a matter of law and conduct for your solicitors as independent professionals.’
However, the note told barristers to ensure that they are not ‘actively and knowingly’ involved in any arrangement where the client is charged more for their services than they are charging in circumstances in which it is unlawful or in breach of the solicitor’s duties to the client.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
