*/
At a packed South Eastern Circuit “road show” on 12 January Baroness Deech, Chair of the Bar Standards Board (“BSB”), described the changes made by the BSB last November to the way in which barristers can supply legal services as “the most important changes in this generation of the Bar”.
She emphasised that she had no wish to preside over fusion and that the decisions were not driven by “the need of the Bar to earn a living”; but rather to permit structures consistent with the principles in the Legal Services Act 2007.
The meeting was only one of several planned in the winter to test the views of the Bar on the way forward while Legal Services Board approval is pending on the proposed amendments to the Code.
Nick Green QC, Chairman of the Bar, said that he had seen a number of chambers’ business plans which are awaiting the green light and which show that no single model will work for everyone. Forming a legal disciplinary partnership is no longer unthinkable.
With the question and answer session dominated by criminal practitioners, the need for the Bar to earn its living was nevertheless uppermost in most people’s minds. Nick Green QC pointed out that the new rules will apply to everyone but one person pointed out that it is the publicly funded Bar, under pressure from HCA’s and Crown advocates, who are more likely to need the permissive authority to compete with solicitors, for example, by bidding to supply legal services through a “procure-co”. Views ranged widely, from those who were uncomfortable about any change to those who favour the end of the “referral profession” by revising the direct access to the client and not to have to rely upon solicitors to do what they have always had a monopoly of doing.
The road shows are likely to be attended by some 700 to 800 barristers in all but the Circuits are encouraged to set up forums to exchange information. Everyone was urged to ask questions and to keep an open mind.
Nick Green QC, Chairman of the Bar, said that he had seen a number of chambers’ business plans which are awaiting the green light and which show that no single model will work for everyone. Forming a legal disciplinary partnership is no longer unthinkable.
With the question and answer session dominated by criminal practitioners, the need for the Bar to earn its living was nevertheless uppermost in most people’s minds. Nick Green QC pointed out that the new rules will apply to everyone but one person pointed out that it is the publicly funded Bar, under pressure from HCA’s and Crown advocates, who are more likely to need the permissive authority to compete with solicitors, for example, by bidding to supply legal services through a “procure-co”. Views ranged widely, from those who were uncomfortable about any change to those who favour the end of the “referral profession” by revising the direct access to the client and not to have to rely upon solicitors to do what they have always had a monopoly of doing.
The road shows are likely to be attended by some 700 to 800 barristers in all but the Circuits are encouraged to set up forums to exchange information. Everyone was urged to ask questions and to keep an open mind.
At a packed South Eastern Circuit “road show” on 12 January Baroness Deech, Chair of the Bar Standards Board (“BSB”), described the changes made by the BSB last November to the way in which barristers can supply legal services as “the most important changes in this generation of the Bar”.
She emphasised that she had no wish to preside over fusion and that the decisions were not driven by “the need of the Bar to earn a living”; but rather to permit structures consistent with the principles in the Legal Services Act 2007.
The meeting was only one of several planned in the winter to test the views of the Bar on the way forward while Legal Services Board approval is pending on the proposed amendments to the Code.
Now is the time to tackle inappropriate behaviour at the Bar as well as extend our reach and collaboration with organisations and individuals at home and abroad
A comparison – Dan Monaghan, Head of DWF Chambers, invites two viewpoints
And if not, why not? asks Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management
Marie Law, Head of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs, discusses the many benefits of oral fluid drug testing for child welfare and protection matters
To mark International Women’s Day, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management looks at how financial planning can help bridge the gap
Casey Randall of AlphaBiolabs answers some of the most common questions regarding relationship DNA testing for court
Maria Scotland and Niamh Wilkie report from the Bar Council’s 2024 visit to the United Arab Emirates exploring practice development opportunities for the England and Wales family Bar
Marking Neurodiversity Week 2025, an anonymous barrister shares the revelations and emotions from a mid-career diagnosis with a view to encouraging others to find out more
David Wurtzel analyses the outcome of the 2024 silk competition and how it compares with previous years, revealing some striking trends and home truths for the profession
Save for some high-flyers and those who can become commercial arbitrators, it is generally a question of all or nothing but that does not mean moving from hero to zero, says Andrew Hillier
