*/
Check the factual basis for the appeal or risk criticism and action by the court, the Bar Council’s Ethics Committee has warned.
In a note, Criminal Appeals – Duties to the Court to Make Enquiries, the committee issued guidance to new barristers instructed in criminal appeals who were not trial counsel.
It sets out a checklist and advises barristers to make inquiries of the legal representatives who acted at the trial in order to ensure that the factual basis for each ground of appeal is correct, and to seek other objective independent evidence to substantiate those facts.
This must be done, says the Bar Council document, ‘whether or not the grounds of appeal may make express or implied criticisms of those former legal representatives’.
Committee chairman, Andrew Walker QC, said: ‘In several recent decisions, the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division has clarified and emphasised the importance of some particular duties to the court when fresh counsel are instructed to represent a convicted defendant in a criminal appeal.
‘When the Court of Appeal highlights an issue such as this, you don’t ignore it. Barristers must not get caught out’.
He said: ‘The Court of Appeal is clearly concerned that in some cases, appeals are being advanced on grounds which turn out to be factually wrong, and has indicated that it will take a strict line with those who do not comply with their duties in this respect.
‘In extreme cases, this could even include referral to the regulator,’ he said.
Check the factual basis for the appeal or risk criticism and action by the court, the Bar Council’s Ethics Committee has warned.
In a note, Criminal Appeals – Duties to the Court to Make Enquiries, the committee issued guidance to new barristers instructed in criminal appeals who were not trial counsel.
It sets out a checklist and advises barristers to make inquiries of the legal representatives who acted at the trial in order to ensure that the factual basis for each ground of appeal is correct, and to seek other objective independent evidence to substantiate those facts.
This must be done, says the Bar Council document, ‘whether or not the grounds of appeal may make express or implied criticisms of those former legal representatives’.
Committee chairman, Andrew Walker QC, said: ‘In several recent decisions, the Court of Appeal, Criminal Division has clarified and emphasised the importance of some particular duties to the court when fresh counsel are instructed to represent a convicted defendant in a criminal appeal.
‘When the Court of Appeal highlights an issue such as this, you don’t ignore it. Barristers must not get caught out’.
He said: ‘The Court of Appeal is clearly concerned that in some cases, appeals are being advanced on grounds which turn out to be factually wrong, and has indicated that it will take a strict line with those who do not comply with their duties in this respect.
‘In extreme cases, this could even include referral to the regulator,’ he said.
Chair of the Bar reflects on 2025
Q&A with criminal barrister Nick Murphy, who moved to New Park Court Chambers on the North Eastern Circuit in search of a better work-life balance
Revolt Cycling in Holborn, London’s first sustainable fitness studio, invites barristers to join the revolution – turning pedal power into clean energy
Rachel Davenport, Co-founder and Director at AlphaBiolabs, reflects on how the company’s Giving Back ethos continues to make a difference to communities across the UK
By Marie Law, Director of Toxicology at AlphaBiolabs
AlphaBiolabs has made a £500 donation to Sean’s Place, a men’s mental health charity based in Sefton, as part of its ongoing Giving Back initiative
Oscar Davies shares their lessons learnt
Little has changed since Burns v Burns . Cohabiting couples deserve better than to be left on the blasted heath with the existing witch’s brew for another four decades, argues Christopher Stirling
Six months of court observation at the Old Bailey: APPEAL’s Dr Nisha Waller and Tehreem Sultan report their findings on prosecution practices under joint enterprise
Despite its prevalence, autism spectrum disorder remains poorly understood in the criminal justice system. Does Alex Henry’s joint enterprise conviction expose the need to audit prisons? asks Dr Felicity Gerry KC
With automation now deeply embedded in the Department for Work Pensions, Alexander McColl and Alexa Thompson review what we know, what we don’t and avenues for legal challenge
