*/
Practice – Hearing. The present judgment was necessitated by a disagreement as to the terms of the order which properly reflected the Divisional Court's previous open and closed judgments (see [2015] All ER (D) 193 (Mar)). The court specified the terms of the declaration that properly reflected the court's judgment. Further, it held that there would be no order for costs, save for assessment of the publicly funded costs of the legally aided interested parties.
Practice – Hearing. The present judgment was necessitated by a disagreement as to the terms of the order which properly reflected the Divisional Court's previous open and closed judgments (see [2015] All ER (D) 193 (Mar)). The court specified the terms of the declaration that properly reflected the court's judgment. Further, it held that there would be no order for costs, save for assessment of the publicly funded costs of the legally aided interested parties.
Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights some of the key achievements at the Bar Council this year
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management highlights some of the ways you can cut your IHT bill
Rachel Davenport breaks down everything you need to know about AlphaBiolabs’ industry-leading laboratory testing services for legal matters
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
Mark Neale, Director General of the Bar Standards Board, offers an update on the Equality Rules consultation
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Imposing a professional obligation to act in a way that advances equality, diversity and inclusion is the wrong way to achieve this ambition, says Nick Vineall KC
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
