*/
Orlagh Kelly delves into the implications of ChatGPT, sharing insights from a recent webinar that brought to light a crucial concern for the junior Bar
ChatGPT, introduced in November 2022, quickly gained widespread attention, amassing over 100 million active users in just two months. Its unique approach, being dialogue-based rather than query-based like traditional search engines, soon captured the interest of legal professionals worldwide.
Briefed, a training platform for lawyers, recently hosted a webinar series for hundreds of barristers and chambers staff exploring the implications of ChatGPT for the profession. A stunning 74% of participants indicated that ChatGPT was a significant opportunity for the Bar.
However, views were mixed in the extensive workshop discussions. One pro-ChatGPTer stated: ‘I think it has the potential to speed up our work and help us become more time efficient’.
Another attendee thought it would put the job of a barrister in jeopardy: ‘As it becomes more widely known, people will think that it is a safe means of obtaining advice they might otherwise come to us for.’
The webinar brought to light concern over the impact on junior barristers in particular – that AI integration could lead to the removal of lower-end legal research, drafting and cases on which pupils and junior barristers cut their teeth.
Conversely, many believed that young or junior barristers able to use AI constructively will be the winners. ChatGPT can expedite work processes in areas such as drafting initial misconduct work, personal injury claims analysis, family law, access to justice research, and paralegal assistance.
A US attorney used AI-generated arguments which fabricated legal precedents that ChatGPT essentially ‘hallucinated’. He was consequently fined by his governing body. This underscores the importance of human oversight in AI-generated content and the role that legal regulators may have to play.
ChatGPT undoubtedly presents exciting prospects for barristers and chambers. However, it is imperative to acknowledge its limitations, potential inaccuracies, and data security concerns. The future lies in a balanced integration of AI with human expertise, where AI augments, rather than replaces, barristers.
As the webinar participants highlighted, ensuring that junior barristers have ample opportunities to develop their skills in a changing environment is a challenge that must be addressed.
The biggest potential risk is, of course, ignoring this new age of technology, and failing to adapt as competitors are steaming ahead.
ChatGPT, introduced in November 2022, quickly gained widespread attention, amassing over 100 million active users in just two months. Its unique approach, being dialogue-based rather than query-based like traditional search engines, soon captured the interest of legal professionals worldwide.
Briefed, a training platform for lawyers, recently hosted a webinar series for hundreds of barristers and chambers staff exploring the implications of ChatGPT for the profession. A stunning 74% of participants indicated that ChatGPT was a significant opportunity for the Bar.
However, views were mixed in the extensive workshop discussions. One pro-ChatGPTer stated: ‘I think it has the potential to speed up our work and help us become more time efficient’.
Another attendee thought it would put the job of a barrister in jeopardy: ‘As it becomes more widely known, people will think that it is a safe means of obtaining advice they might otherwise come to us for.’
The webinar brought to light concern over the impact on junior barristers in particular – that AI integration could lead to the removal of lower-end legal research, drafting and cases on which pupils and junior barristers cut their teeth.
Conversely, many believed that young or junior barristers able to use AI constructively will be the winners. ChatGPT can expedite work processes in areas such as drafting initial misconduct work, personal injury claims analysis, family law, access to justice research, and paralegal assistance.
A US attorney used AI-generated arguments which fabricated legal precedents that ChatGPT essentially ‘hallucinated’. He was consequently fined by his governing body. This underscores the importance of human oversight in AI-generated content and the role that legal regulators may have to play.
ChatGPT undoubtedly presents exciting prospects for barristers and chambers. However, it is imperative to acknowledge its limitations, potential inaccuracies, and data security concerns. The future lies in a balanced integration of AI with human expertise, where AI augments, rather than replaces, barristers.
As the webinar participants highlighted, ensuring that junior barristers have ample opportunities to develop their skills in a changing environment is a challenge that must be addressed.
The biggest potential risk is, of course, ignoring this new age of technology, and failing to adapt as competitors are steaming ahead.
Orlagh Kelly delves into the implications of ChatGPT, sharing insights from a recent webinar that brought to light a crucial concern for the junior Bar
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series