*/
Profession
Solicitors are being urged to negotiate alternative terms with barristers, following the introduction of the Bar’s new standard contractual terms.
The Law Society has claimed that the terms of engagement, which came into effect at the end of January, are “weighted strongly in favour of barristers”. In a practice note, the Society has raised particular concern over clauses strengthening barristers’ intellectual property rights; exclusions from liability; increased hourly rates; payment terms; and money laundering responsibilities.
Several firms of solicitors have contacted chambers to advise that they have no intention of agreeing to the new contractual terms.
The Bar Council has mounted a rigorous defence. Expressing surprise and disappointment, the Bar Council warned that “the Law Society’s proposed variations give rise to some serious potential difficulties. For example, some of the variations run counter to guidance already approved by the Law Society, and some might lead to barristers incurring liabilities which are not covered by their professional indemnity insurance, resulting in a risk of professional misconduct and detriment to lay clients. One would give the solicitor absolute discretion about when the barrister should be paid, which could lead to financial hardship for the barrister unless proper safeguards were agreed.”
Specific guidance from the Bar Council is available on the fees collection page of www.barcouncil.org.uk.
The Law Society has claimed that the terms of engagement, which came into effect at the end of January, are “weighted strongly in favour of barristers”. In a practice note, the Society has raised particular concern over clauses strengthening barristers’ intellectual property rights; exclusions from liability; increased hourly rates; payment terms; and money laundering responsibilities.
Several firms of solicitors have contacted chambers to advise that they have no intention of agreeing to the new contractual terms.
The Bar Council has mounted a rigorous defence. Expressing surprise and disappointment, the Bar Council warned that “the Law Society’s proposed variations give rise to some serious potential difficulties. For example, some of the variations run counter to guidance already approved by the Law Society, and some might lead to barristers incurring liabilities which are not covered by their professional indemnity insurance, resulting in a risk of professional misconduct and detriment to lay clients. One would give the solicitor absolute discretion about when the barrister should be paid, which could lead to financial hardship for the barrister unless proper safeguards were agreed.”
Specific guidance from the Bar Council is available on the fees collection page of www.barcouncil.org.uk.
Profession
Solicitors are being urged to negotiate alternative terms with barristers, following the introduction of the Bar’s new standard contractual terms.
Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights some of the key achievements at the Bar Council this year
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management highlights some of the ways you can cut your IHT bill
Rachel Davenport breaks down everything you need to know about AlphaBiolabs’ industry-leading laboratory testing services for legal matters
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
Mark Neale, Director General of the Bar Standards Board, offers an update on the Equality Rules consultation
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Imposing a professional obligation to act in a way that advances equality, diversity and inclusion is the wrong way to achieve this ambition, says Nick Vineall KC
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
