*/
Criminal Bar Association
This was a nuts and bolts session, full of practical and unrhetorical advice, with some golden nuggets. Designed to encourage audience participation and chaired by Angela Rafferty QC in a friendly, laid-back way, it was positive in character and content. I sensed the need for that from a number of concerned questions, for the criminal Bar is surviving against the odds and our young are suffering. ‘How do they help themselves?’ asked one delegate. Try not to be pigeon holed. Become an expert in your own field. Offer an article to Counsel! Good ideas came consistently from HHJ Deborah Taylor and Eleanor Laws QC.
Naturally the panel discussed the problems raised by coming back to practice after childbirth. Diversity also recognised younger male barristers who may have caring responsibilities. HHJ Peter Rooke QC, having described himself as the statutory male on the panel, gave a picture of the bad old days in chambers, now gone. Later he stressed the absolute importance of showing your quality, eg knowing the law of evidence backwards.
Advice too for preparing for Silk or judicial posts. Good record-keeping, preparation and getting an independent figure to review your applications. Try to prosecute and defend. Know the criteria. In other words, bring the professionalism which governs your work to your own career path. HHJ Taylor said that the competition on one occasion had been 1,500 applications for 60 judicial placements. There is no ‘we’ – it must be ‘I’, for you must evidence fully your own competencies. The panel also contained one fluent younger practitioner, Emma Fenn, who will go far.
As a top tip, I liked the advice – be brief, be bright, be gone! Don’t whisper or make faces or talk over the judge. Don’t ever make personal attacks on your opponents. Be aware of legal developments. Sitting will improve your own advocacy, as you suffer pleas in aggravation. Preparation must not be too rigid, for part of cross examination is what falls out of the tree. There followed a constructive audience response of mentoring in chambers. Your correspondent’s view is that, ideally, it should continue for at least three years after pupillage.
Near the end, a very experienced old hand, Peter Birkett QC raised the topic of criminal pupillages. The response was how rare they are, particularly in London. That for me was the most sobering moment. The Criminal Bar Association must fight on and chambers must work with them.
Nigel is a former leader of the Western Circuit, practises crime from Pump Court Chambers, and is a Master of Drama in the Inner Temple. He is on the editorial board of Counsel.
This was a nuts and bolts session, full of practical and unrhetorical advice, with some golden nuggets. Designed to encourage audience participation and chaired by Angela Rafferty QC in a friendly, laid-back way, it was positive in character and content. I sensed the need for that from a number of concerned questions, for the criminal Bar is surviving against the odds and our young are suffering. ‘How do they help themselves?’ asked one delegate. Try not to be pigeon holed. Become an expert in your own field. Offer an article to Counsel! Good ideas came consistently from HHJ Deborah Taylor and Eleanor Laws QC.
Naturally the panel discussed the problems raised by coming back to practice after childbirth. Diversity also recognised younger male barristers who may have caring responsibilities. HHJ Peter Rooke QC, having described himself as the statutory male on the panel, gave a picture of the bad old days in chambers, now gone. Later he stressed the absolute importance of showing your quality, eg knowing the law of evidence backwards.
Advice too for preparing for Silk or judicial posts. Good record-keeping, preparation and getting an independent figure to review your applications. Try to prosecute and defend. Know the criteria. In other words, bring the professionalism which governs your work to your own career path. HHJ Taylor said that the competition on one occasion had been 1,500 applications for 60 judicial placements. There is no ‘we’ – it must be ‘I’, for you must evidence fully your own competencies. The panel also contained one fluent younger practitioner, Emma Fenn, who will go far.
As a top tip, I liked the advice – be brief, be bright, be gone! Don’t whisper or make faces or talk over the judge. Don’t ever make personal attacks on your opponents. Be aware of legal developments. Sitting will improve your own advocacy, as you suffer pleas in aggravation. Preparation must not be too rigid, for part of cross examination is what falls out of the tree. There followed a constructive audience response of mentoring in chambers. Your correspondent’s view is that, ideally, it should continue for at least three years after pupillage.
Near the end, a very experienced old hand, Peter Birkett QC raised the topic of criminal pupillages. The response was how rare they are, particularly in London. That for me was the most sobering moment. The Criminal Bar Association must fight on and chambers must work with them.
Criminal Bar Association
The beginning of the legal year offers the opportunity for a renewed commitment to justice and the rule of law both at home and abroad
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
Providing bespoke mortgage and protection solutions for barristers
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
From a traumatic formative education to exceptional criminal silk – Laurie-Anne Power KC talks about her path to the Bar, pursuit of equality and speaking out against discrimination (not just during Black History Month)
Irresponsible use of AI can lead to serious and embarrassing consequences. Sam Thomas briefs barristers on the five key risks and how to avoid them
Yasmin Ilhan explains the Law Commission’s proposals for a quicker, easier and more effective contempt of court regime
James Onalaja concludes his two-part opinion series
