*/
Judiciary/Diversity
It will take 50 years to secure a fully diverse judiciary on merit alone, warned Lord Sumption at the Bar Council 12th Annual Law Reform Lecture (15 November 2012).
“Positive discrimination,” said the Supreme Court Justice, “is the only thing that is likely to accelerate the rate of progress significantly. It does not of course follow that positive discrimination is desirable... But it should at least be on the menu.”
Sumption, a former member of the Judicial Appointments Commission, said that the profession was deluding itself without an “honest public debate about the hitherto unmentionable subject of positive discrimination. We have to decide whether we want to accept a measure of positive discrimination in the selection of judges, as the price of making faster progress towards judicial diversity. There are arguments both for and against it. But the real problem is that the debate has not happened.”
Lord Judge, Lord Chief Justice, however, speaking at the Judge for Yourself event on 22 November, endorsed the merit-based approach to appointment: “I want the people best qualified to be judges to be appointed as judges. And only people of the necessary quality. No more, and certainly no less.”
Diversity has started its slow trickle through, according to Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) statistics released last month. A quarter of the lawyers recently recommended for appointment as 28 Deputy District Judges (Magistrates’ Courts) were black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME), and women made up 46 per cent of the selections, compared to 44 per cent of the eligible pool - a slight improvement since the 2009 exercise.
Christopher Stephens, Chairman of the JAC, said: “Selections, as always, were made solely on merit and I am delighted to see such a strong performance from BAME lawyers and continued good results for women. There is still a long way to go on judicial diversity and we hope this success is consolidated in other competitions, with the results feeding through to salaried and more senior appointments in the future.”
“Positive discrimination,” said the Supreme Court Justice, “is the only thing that is likely to accelerate the rate of progress significantly. It does not of course follow that positive discrimination is desirable... But it should at least be on the menu.”
Sumption, a former member of the Judicial Appointments Commission, said that the profession was deluding itself without an “honest public debate about the hitherto unmentionable subject of positive discrimination. We have to decide whether we want to accept a measure of positive discrimination in the selection of judges, as the price of making faster progress towards judicial diversity. There are arguments both for and against it. But the real problem is that the debate has not happened.”
Lord Judge, Lord Chief Justice, however, speaking at the Judge for Yourself event on 22 November, endorsed the merit-based approach to appointment: “I want the people best qualified to be judges to be appointed as judges. And only people of the necessary quality. No more, and certainly no less.”
Diversity has started its slow trickle through, according to Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) statistics released last month. A quarter of the lawyers recently recommended for appointment as 28 Deputy District Judges (Magistrates’ Courts) were black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME), and women made up 46 per cent of the selections, compared to 44 per cent of the eligible pool - a slight improvement since the 2009 exercise.
Christopher Stephens, Chairman of the JAC, said: “Selections, as always, were made solely on merit and I am delighted to see such a strong performance from BAME lawyers and continued good results for women. There is still a long way to go on judicial diversity and we hope this success is consolidated in other competitions, with the results feeding through to salaried and more senior appointments in the future.”
Judiciary/Diversity
It will take 50 years to secure a fully diverse judiciary on merit alone, warned Lord Sumption at the Bar Council 12th Annual Law Reform Lecture (15 November 2012).
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
In the first of a new series, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth considers the fundamental need for financial protection
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Possibly, but many barristers are glad he did…
Mental health charity Mind BWW has received a £500 donation from drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs as part of its Giving Back campaign
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law is thrilled to announce its inaugural essay competition
How to navigate open source evidence in an era of deepfakes. By Professor Yvonne McDermott Rees and Professor Alexa Koenig
Brie Stevens-Hoare KC and Lyndsey de Mestre KC take a look at the difficulties women encounter during the menopause, and offer some practical tips for individuals and chambers to make things easier
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice since January 2021, is well known for his passion for access to justice and all things digital. Perhaps less widely known is the driven personality and wanderlust that lies behind this, as Anthony Inglese CB discovers
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
No-one should have to live in sub-standard accommodation, says Antony Hodari Solicitors. We are tackling the problem of bad housing with a two-pronged approach and act on behalf of tenants in both the civil and criminal courts