*/
Profession
The Supreme Court has ruled against extending legal professional privilege (LPP) to non-lawyers, following a case put forward by financial services group Prudential, requesting its extension to protect advice given by accountants.
In R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) (Appellants) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another (Respondents) [2013] UKSC 1, the majority (5:2) held that LPP should not be extended to communications in connection with advice given by professional people other than lawyers, even where that advice is legal advice.
Extending LPP would bring uncertainty to a clear and well understood principle and raise questions of policy which should be left to Parliament, the judges said.
The Bar Council intervened in the case, represented on a pro bono basis by Field Fisher Waterhouse, and counsel Bankim Thanki QC, Ben Valentine and Henry King. The Bar Council argued that extending LPP would undermine the necessary absolute confidentiality agreement between lawyers and clients, create uncertainty around the established scope of LPP, and constitute a significant inroad into the principle, necessary for the sound administration of justice, that relevant material should be placed before the court.
In R (on the application of Prudential plc and another) (Appellants) v Special Commissioner of Income Tax and another (Respondents) [2013] UKSC 1, the majority (5:2) held that LPP should not be extended to communications in connection with advice given by professional people other than lawyers, even where that advice is legal advice.
Extending LPP would bring uncertainty to a clear and well understood principle and raise questions of policy which should be left to Parliament, the judges said.
The Bar Council intervened in the case, represented on a pro bono basis by Field Fisher Waterhouse, and counsel Bankim Thanki QC, Ben Valentine and Henry King. The Bar Council argued that extending LPP would undermine the necessary absolute confidentiality agreement between lawyers and clients, create uncertainty around the established scope of LPP, and constitute a significant inroad into the principle, necessary for the sound administration of justice, that relevant material should be placed before the court.
Profession
The Supreme Court has ruled against extending legal professional privilege (LPP) to non-lawyers, following a case put forward by financial services group Prudential, requesting its extension to protect advice given by accountants.
Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights some of the key achievements at the Bar Council this year
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management highlights some of the ways you can cut your IHT bill
Rachel Davenport breaks down everything you need to know about AlphaBiolabs’ industry-leading laboratory testing services for legal matters
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
Mark Neale, Director General of the Bar Standards Board, offers an update on the Equality Rules consultation
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Imposing a professional obligation to act in a way that advances equality, diversity and inclusion is the wrong way to achieve this ambition, says Nick Vineall KC
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
