*/
Profession
The Bar Standards Board is pressing ahead with preparatory steps for the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA), despite a judicial review launched against the scheme last month.
Proceedings were issued by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) over the legality of the scheme in September. Respondents served are the Legal Services Board (LSB), with the Bar Standards Board (BSB), Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards as interested parties.
Public law specialists, consulted over the summer by the CBA, had advised that QASA was open to legal challenge “for reasons far broader and fundamental than the legitimate objections already raised by the Criminal Bar,” said Nigel Lithman QC, new Chair of the CBA. Judicial review was an “inevitable step”, he said, but success was “not guaranteed”.
Dinah Rose QC and Tom De La Mare QC of Blackstone Chambers, and Joanna Ludlum of Baker McKenzie, are acting pro bono, with the action indemnified by the CBA.
The LSB has said it will respond to the judicial review “in line with established procedures” and will make every effort to “limit the cost exposure of the legal profession to this action on behalf of the criminal Bar”. Lithman, who previously accused the BSB of “meanness of spirit” in not declaring the same, said that “current exchanges involved our trying to cap the cost of proceedings”.
Vanessa Davies, Director of the BSB, confirmed that: “The claimants, the LSB (as defendants) and the BSB as an interested party have written to the court regarding costs. This is a matter for the court to decide. The BSB has now written twice to Baker and McKenzie who are acting for the claimants and the CBA, offering to discuss a suitable costs cap: there was no response to this suggestion.”
No stay of steps towards implementation had been sought, said the BSB, and the scheme will remain open for registration. If permission for judicial review is granted, the case would be “heard and decided before any assessments are made and the first phase of registration ends,” it added.
Proceedings were issued by the Criminal Bar Association (CBA) over the legality of the scheme in September. Respondents served are the Legal Services Board (LSB), with the Bar Standards Board (BSB), Solicitors Regulation Authority and ILEX Professional Standards as interested parties.
Public law specialists, consulted over the summer by the CBA, had advised that QASA was open to legal challenge “for reasons far broader and fundamental than the legitimate objections already raised by the Criminal Bar,” said Nigel Lithman QC, new Chair of the CBA. Judicial review was an “inevitable step”, he said, but success was “not guaranteed”.
Dinah Rose QC and Tom De La Mare QC of Blackstone Chambers, and Joanna Ludlum of Baker McKenzie, are acting pro bono, with the action indemnified by the CBA.
The LSB has said it will respond to the judicial review “in line with established procedures” and will make every effort to “limit the cost exposure of the legal profession to this action on behalf of the criminal Bar”. Lithman, who previously accused the BSB of “meanness of spirit” in not declaring the same, said that “current exchanges involved our trying to cap the cost of proceedings”.
Vanessa Davies, Director of the BSB, confirmed that: “The claimants, the LSB (as defendants) and the BSB as an interested party have written to the court regarding costs. This is a matter for the court to decide. The BSB has now written twice to Baker and McKenzie who are acting for the claimants and the CBA, offering to discuss a suitable costs cap: there was no response to this suggestion.”
No stay of steps towards implementation had been sought, said the BSB, and the scheme will remain open for registration. If permission for judicial review is granted, the case would be “heard and decided before any assessments are made and the first phase of registration ends,” it added.
Profession
The Bar Standards Board is pressing ahead with preparatory steps for the Quality Assurance Scheme for Advocates (QASA), despite a judicial review launched against the scheme last month.
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
In the first of a new series, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth considers the fundamental need for financial protection
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Possibly, but many barristers are glad he did…
Mental health charity Mind BWW has received a £500 donation from drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs as part of its Giving Back campaign
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law is thrilled to announce its inaugural essay competition
How to navigate open source evidence in an era of deepfakes. By Professor Yvonne McDermott Rees and Professor Alexa Koenig
Brie Stevens-Hoare KC and Lyndsey de Mestre KC take a look at the difficulties women encounter during the menopause, and offer some practical tips for individuals and chambers to make things easier
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice since January 2021, is well known for his passion for access to justice and all things digital. Perhaps less widely known is the driven personality and wanderlust that lies behind this, as Anthony Inglese CB discovers
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
No-one should have to live in sub-standard accommodation, says Antony Hodari Solicitors. We are tackling the problem of bad housing with a two-pronged approach and act on behalf of tenants in both the civil and criminal courts