*/
The Bar may have got better at recruiting women, but problems remain with their retention and treatment in the profession, according to two Bar Council reports.
In the first, Momentum Measures: Creating a diverse profession, the Bar Council said that a 50:50 balance of men and women entering the profession had been achieved and maintained since 2000.
But, due to issues that mean many women quit, it accepted that achieving a 50:50 split between men and woman practising barristers is “unlikely ever to be reached”.
Head of policy, equality, diversity and CSR, Sam Mercer, said: “The self-employed nature of the profession is a significant barrier to those who wish to have a family and stay in practice and legal aid cuts are making retention even more difficult.”
The second report, Snapshot: The experience of self-employed women at the Bar, painted a picture of sexism and harassment, with women objectified, discriminated against and pigeon-holed into doing family law or sexual offence cases because of their gender.
Among the litany of examples was that of a pupil who alleged that her supervisor told her she looked “quite fuckable” and said she ought to wear a jacket because he was “only human”.
One barrister said her senior clerk sold her to a solicitor on the basis that she had “a great pair of legs”.
While another said: ‘Too many men at the Bar feel that they are existing in a children’s playground, [they] think they can say grossly disrespectful things because nobody is going to stop them.”
Bar chair Alistair MacDonald QC said: “Whilst most of the experiences of sexism, harassment and discrimination quoted in the report are historical, experiences of inappropriate behaviour within the profession continue to exist.”
Although some women had “negative experiences and worked in a very challenging environment”, MacDonald said those who participated in the research “loved” the Bar. Others’ positive experiences, he said, challenge the view that the Bar is not women–friendly.
Meanwhile, the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas, expressed disappointment that there had been “little marked improvement” in the percentage of judges from black and minority ethnic (BME)backgrounds, following publication of the 2015 Judicial Diversity Statistics.
The data showed that 159 of the 2,686 (5.9%) judges were from a BME background, up slightly from the 5.1% (154 out of 2,992) in 2011.
The Bar may have got better at recruiting women, but problems remain with their retention and treatment in the profession, according to two Bar Council reports.
In the first, Momentum Measures: Creating a diverse profession, the Bar Council said that a 50:50 balance of men and women entering the profession had been achieved and maintained since 2000.
But, due to issues that mean many women quit, it accepted that achieving a 50:50 split between men and woman practising barristers is “unlikely ever to be reached”.
Head of policy, equality, diversity and CSR, Sam Mercer, said: “The self-employed nature of the profession is a significant barrier to those who wish to have a family and stay in practice and legal aid cuts are making retention even more difficult.”
The second report, Snapshot: The experience of self-employed women at the Bar, painted a picture of sexism and harassment, with women objectified, discriminated against and pigeon-holed into doing family law or sexual offence cases because of their gender.
Among the litany of examples was that of a pupil who alleged that her supervisor told her she looked “quite fuckable” and said she ought to wear a jacket because he was “only human”.
One barrister said her senior clerk sold her to a solicitor on the basis that she had “a great pair of legs”.
While another said: ‘Too many men at the Bar feel that they are existing in a children’s playground, [they] think they can say grossly disrespectful things because nobody is going to stop them.”
Bar chair Alistair MacDonald QC said: “Whilst most of the experiences of sexism, harassment and discrimination quoted in the report are historical, experiences of inappropriate behaviour within the profession continue to exist.”
Although some women had “negative experiences and worked in a very challenging environment”, MacDonald said those who participated in the research “loved” the Bar. Others’ positive experiences, he said, challenge the view that the Bar is not women–friendly.
Meanwhile, the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Thomas, expressed disappointment that there had been “little marked improvement” in the percentage of judges from black and minority ethnic (BME)backgrounds, following publication of the 2015 Judicial Diversity Statistics.
The data showed that 159 of the 2,686 (5.9%) judges were from a BME background, up slightly from the 5.1% (154 out of 2,992) in 2011.
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
In the first of a new series, Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth considers the fundamental need for financial protection
Unlocking your aged debt to fund your tax in one easy step. By Philip N Bristow
Possibly, but many barristers are glad he did…
Mental health charity Mind BWW has received a £500 donation from drug, alcohol and DNA testing laboratory, AlphaBiolabs as part of its Giving Back campaign
The Institute of Neurotechnology & Law is thrilled to announce its inaugural essay competition
How to navigate open source evidence in an era of deepfakes. By Professor Yvonne McDermott Rees and Professor Alexa Koenig
Brie Stevens-Hoare KC and Lyndsey de Mestre KC take a look at the difficulties women encounter during the menopause, and offer some practical tips for individuals and chambers to make things easier
Sir Geoffrey Vos, Master of the Rolls and Head of Civil Justice since January 2021, is well known for his passion for access to justice and all things digital. Perhaps less widely known is the driven personality and wanderlust that lies behind this, as Anthony Inglese CB discovers
The Chair of the Bar sets out how the new government can restore the justice system
No-one should have to live in sub-standard accommodation, says Antony Hodari Solicitors. We are tackling the problem of bad housing with a two-pronged approach and act on behalf of tenants in both the civil and criminal courts