Latest Cases

Road Traffic – Disqualification from driving. The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, provided guidance as to the effect of the introduction into the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988 of sections 35A and 35B, provisions relating to disqualification of driving. In particular, it set out a checklist indicating an appropriate way of working to formal sentencing decisions in respect of disqualification. 

Town and country planning – Permission for development. The Administrative Court dismissed the claimant's challenge to the decision of the first defendant Secretary of State, dismissing its appeal against the refusal of planning permission for two alternative developments. There had been no misinterpretation of the National Planning Policy Framework, and no error with respect to the five-year housing supply or the discount of the claimant's proposed contribution to a bridge. 

European Union – Directives. The Court of Justice of the European Union gave a preliminary ruling in proceedings between Pillbox 38 (UK) Ltd and the Secretary of State for Health in the United Kingdom, concerning the validity of art 20 of Directive 2014/14/EU in the context of the legality of the 'intention and/or obligation' of the UK government to implement that directive. The Court decided that there was no factor of any kind as to affect the validity, in whole or in part, of art 20 of Directive 2014/14/EU. 

European Union – Residence. The Court of Justice of the European Union gave a preliminary ruling, deciding that art 7(1)(c) of Council Directive (EC) 2003/86 should be interpreted as allowing the competent authorities of a member state to refuse an application for family reunification on the basis of a prospective assessment of the likelihood of the sponsor retaining, or failing to retain, the necessary stable and regular resources which were sufficient to maintain himself and the members of his family, without recourse to the social assistance system of that member state, in the year following the date of submission of that application, that assessment being based on the pattern of the sponsor's income in the six months preceding that date. 

Negligence – Duty to take care. The county court dismissed the claimant's claim for damages for physical and emotional abuse caused by a licensee on parole after a murder conviction. The Secretary of State had not owed the claimant a duty of care to investigate the initial allegations that she had been in a relationship with the licensee in a different, more thorough, manner, nor had he owed a duty to warn the claimant of the licensee's background. 

Negligence – Causation. The Queen's Bench Division held, in dismissing the claimant's case in negligence against the Secretary of State for Health, that there had been no breach of duty in respect of the delivery of a twin in circumstances where she was deprived of oxygen and suffered serious brain injury. 

Contract – Construction. The Technology and Construction Court determined two preliminary issues in the course of proceedings concerning a claim for damages for delay in sub-contract works on the Rolls Building. It ruled that: (i) on the assumption that EMCOR was entitled to an extension of time, pursuant to the sub-contract, as amended, the sub-contract required that such revised or further revised period or periods were added contiguously to the end of the current period within which the sub-contract works should be completed; and (ii) the claimant's liability to the Rolls for liquidated and ascertained damages for the relevant period had not been not extinguished by a further supplemental agreement. 

Sentence – Mandatory life sentence. The Divisional Court dismissed the claimant's application for judicial review of the defendant Secretary of State's acceptance of the judge's determination that his tariff should not be reduced. Although a victim personal statement should not have been considered by the judge if its author had been unwilling to have it disclosed to the claimant, the judge's decision had been inevitable. 

Value added tax – Appeal. The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) dismissed the appellants' appeal against a finding of the First Tier Tribunal that the sale of the freehold interest in the property to them by the trustee had been chargeable to VAT at the standard rate. The interpretation of para 30 of Sch 10 to the Value Added Tax Act 1994 that the appellants put forward was a strained construction, and the issue would be decided in favour of the defendant Revenue and Customs Commissioners. 

European Union – Trade marks. The General Court of the European Union dismissed the action brought by Aranynektár Termékgyártó és Kereskedelmi KFT (Aranynektár) against the decision of the Second Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office concerning opposition proceedings between Naturval Apícola, SL, and Aranynektár, regarding the application by the latter for registration of the word sign 'Natur-bal' as an EU trade mark.