Latest Cases

Feeds

Shaw v Kovac

Damages – Assessment. The Queen's Bench Division held that the claimant was entitled to damages for pain suffering and loss of amenity, damages for treatment expenses and funeral expenses in the sum of £7,113.17 on behalf of the father's estate following his death at the second defendant hospital. 

Edwards and another v BT Managed Services Ltd

Employment – Transfer of employment. The Employment Appeal Tribunal, in dismissing an employee's appeal, held that the tribunal had not erred in ruling that because an employee, who had been on long term sick leave, had not contributed to the economic activity of a company's grouping he not assigned to that grouping and his employment had not transferred to a new employer within meaning of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006, SI 2006/246. 

Accord Healthcare Ltd and another v Astellas Pharma GmbH and another

Patent – Medicine. The Chancery Division made declarations as sought by the claimant pharmaceutical companies. It held that the initial marketing authorisation for a drug, Ribomustin, had been obtained in 2005, as contended by the claimants, rather than 2010, as contended by the defendant pharmaceutical companies. As a result, the ten-year period of delay before the claimants could market their own product had commenced in 2005, not 2010. 

Latam Airlines Group SA and another company v European Commission

European Commission – Rules on competition. The General Court of the European Union allowed the application by Latam Airlines Group SA and Lan Cargo SA for annulment of Commission Decision C(2010) 7694 final (the contested decision) in which the European Commission had found that Air Canada and other carriers had participated in a single and continuous infringement of EU competition law by co-ordinating its behaviour as regards the pricing of freight services. The General Court decided that the contested decision was vitiated by a defective statement of reasons which justified its annulment. 

Ramphal v Department for Transport

Employment – Unfair dismissal. The employee had been dismissed following an investigation into possible misconduct. He appealed against the employment tribunal's dismissal of his claim for unfair dismissal. The Employment Appeal Tribunal, in allowing the appeal, ruled that, the tribunal had erred in failing to give consideration to what had led to the investigating officer having a change of heart in circumstances where the Human Resources appeared to have persuaded him to take more critical view of the employee's conduct and to reject his explanation. Whilst an investigating officer was entitled to seek guidance from Human Resources or others, such advice should be limited to matters of law and procedure and to ensuring that all necessary matters have been addressed and achieve clarity. 

*R (on the application AZ) v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Immigration – Refugee. The Administrative Court dismissed the claimant Syrian national's procedural judicial review challenge to the defendant Secretary of State's decision to refuse to provide him a travel document for reasons of national security. Although the pending closed material procedure had inherent limitations, it had been considered consistent with the requirements of fairness, art 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights and/or art 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union for other purposes, and the claimant was not entitled to more. 

CareAbout GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

European Union – Trade marks. The General Court of the European Union dismissed the action brought by CareAbout GmbH (CareAbout) against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs), relating to opposition proceedings between José Luis Florido Rodriguez and CareAbout concerning the application by the latter for registration of the word sign 'kerashot' as a Community trade mark. 

Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien GmbH v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)

European Union – Trade marks. The General Court of the European Union dismissed the action brought by Rotkäppchen-Mumm Sektkellereien GmbH (Rotkäppchen-Mumm) against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of the Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) relating to opposition proceedings between Rotkäppchen-Mumm and Alberto Ruiz Moncayo concerning the application by the latter for registration of the word sign 'REd RIDING HOOD' as a Community trade mark. 

Re Allanfield Property Insurance Services Ltd (in administration); Re Industrial and Commercial Property Insurance Consultants Ltd (in administration);

Insolvency – Administration. The Companies Court held that directions for the administration of the statutory trusts could be given on an application under para 63 to Sch B1 to the Insolvency Act 1986 Act and, on the application of the administrators, it gave directions regarding the distribution of money in the client accounts of insurance intermediary companies, AXA and Aviva, which had gone into administration. 

MGN Ltd v Yentob

Costs – Order for costs. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, dismissed the defendant's appeal concerning whether the judge had been wrong to have held that the claimant should not suffer the normal consequences of not having accepted a CPR Pt 36 offer. The judge had concluded that the normal consequences would be unjust and that conclusion had been based on relevant considerations. 

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results
virtual magazine View virtual issue

Chair’s Column

Feature image

Investment in justice

The Bar Council will press for investment in justice at party conferences, the Chancellor’s Budget and Spending Review

Job of the Week

Sponsored

Most Viewed

Partner Logo

Latest Cases