Immigration – Leave to remain. The inapt use of 'sufficient' by the Upper Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) (the UT) did not lead to the conclusion that it had introduced an impermissible test of sufficiency. The Court of Appeal, Civil Division, in dismissing the appellant Bangladeshi national's appeal, held that, given the evidence before it and applying the right test, the First-tier Tribunal (Immigration and Asylum Chamber) conclusion that the appellant had no family life for the purposes of art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights had plainly been open to it and the appeal to the UT had rightly failed.