*/
Practice – Summary judgment. The claimant Middle Eastern banks (the banks) claimed that the first defendant had falsely claimed to have an irrevocable power of attorney from them and had purportedly entered into partnerships, governed by English law, under which the relevant bank was the general partner and he was the limited partner, which he had then registered with the Registrar of Companies (the Registrar). They alleged that he had then used the certificate of registration as an instrument of fraud. The Chancery Division granted the banks summary judgment, holding that the first defendant had no real prospect of successfully defending the claims. However, the court declined to order the Registrar to delete the registration of the limited partnerships, holding that notwithstanding the circumstances which had led to the registration, once the certificate of registration had been issued, that was conclusive evidence that a limited partnership had come into existence, for the purposes of s 8C(4) of the Limited Partnerships Act 1907. The principle that fraud unravelled all was not a sufficient basis to go behind the conclusive evidence provision in s 8C of the Act.
Practice – Summary judgment. The claimant Middle Eastern banks (the banks) claimed that the first defendant had falsely claimed to have an irrevocable power of attorney from them and had purportedly entered into partnerships, governed by English law, under which the relevant bank was the general partner and he was the limited partner, which he had then registered with the Registrar of Companies (the Registrar). They alleged that he had then used the certificate of registration as an instrument of fraud. The Chancery Division granted the banks summary judgment, holding that the first defendant had no real prospect of successfully defending the claims. However, the court declined to order the Registrar to delete the registration of the limited partnerships, holding that notwithstanding the circumstances which had led to the registration, once the certificate of registration had been issued, that was conclusive evidence that a limited partnership had come into existence, for the purposes of s 8C(4) of the Limited Partnerships Act 1907. The principle that fraud unravelled all was not a sufficient basis to go behind the conclusive evidence provision in s 8C of the Act.
Chair of the Bar Sam Townend KC highlights some of the key achievements at the Bar Council this year
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management highlights some of the ways you can cut your IHT bill
Rachel Davenport breaks down everything you need to know about AlphaBiolabs’ industry-leading laboratory testing services for legal matters
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management sets out the key steps to your dream property
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the Youth Justice Legal Centre provides specialist training, an advice line and a membership programme
By Kem Kemal of Henry Dannell
Mark Neale, Director General of the Bar Standards Board, offers an update on the Equality Rules consultation
Joanna Hardy-Susskind speaks to those walking away from the criminal Bar
Imposing a professional obligation to act in a way that advances equality, diversity and inclusion is the wrong way to achieve this ambition, says Nick Vineall KC
Tom Cosgrove KC looks at the government’s radical planning reform and the opportunities and challenges ahead for practitioners
By Ashley Friday of AlphaBiolabs
