*/
Professional misconduct – Disciplinary proceedings. The appellant pharmacist appealed against the decision of the respondent General Pharmaceutical Council's Fitness to Practise Committee (the FPC) to remove him from the Register of Pharmacists, as his fitness to practise was impaired. The Administrative Court, in dismissing the appeal, held that the FPC's decision had not been wrong in its determination of the facts and there had been no procedural irregularity or unfairness in its proceedings. Further, the decision to remove the appellant from the Register of Pharmacists had been open to it and had not breached art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Professional misconduct – Disciplinary proceedings. The appellant pharmacist appealed against the decision of the respondent General Pharmaceutical Council's Fitness to Practise Committee (the FPC) to remove him from the Register of Pharmacists, as his fitness to practise was impaired. The Administrative Court, in dismissing the appeal, held that the FPC's decision had not been wrong in its determination of the facts and there had been no procedural irregularity or unfairness in its proceedings. Further, the decision to remove the appellant from the Register of Pharmacists had been open to it and had not breached art 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
Barbara Mills KC, the new Chair of the Bar, outlines some key themes and priorities
A family lawyer has won a £500 donation for her...
Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth Management...
Rachel Davenport breaks down everything you...
By Louise Crush of Westgate Wealth...
A centre of excellence for youth justice, the...
What's it like being a legal trainee at the...
Barbara Mills KC wants to raise the profile of...
Are Birmingham’s Intensive Supervision Courts...
Professor Dominic Regan and Seán Jones KC...
Governments who play fast and loose with the...